1097: Unable to convince myself..

 .. to accept staying in this situation, and therefore I am back to declaring that what I want is for this matter with the corruption guy to end as soon as possible (weekends and holidays included) according to the offer I made him. This want is now in the form of a preference but may get upgraded to a right based demand at any point I find that I have that right. And frankly speaking, how many people have already decided or are struggling not to see that the other side had already failed to carry its part of the deal, let alone seeing that what was done was the best choice or even a good choice, or that it was really done for me. Looking at this, an outsider could conclude that the other side had no real intention for doing its part, or with believing the other way around, that outsider could laugh the sucks off (as they say) on the notion that despite having such alternative, a person is being burdened more like this in order to be compensated more for the same burden. I had all those years riding on how this end would be dealt with and it failed me. 

...

You can end this today at the offer, but you keep it to end tomorrow for a trillion more? I, still, would count that on you rather than for you. Although throwing numbers in this manner might make an outsider assume that I am light years away from such lacking of tangible acknowledgments.

...

                                   (Added March 30-31, 2024)

Incase it is thought otherwise, the above does not take away anything from post 1095

And although the physical and material effect was part of the above, I wouldn't have written it just because of them. I still can get into thoughts and researches I want to do that can make me think it is still April in June. And this is not to fill time but for what I on my own very much want to do. 

...

Okay, I just realized that I have been for the past couple of months here applying morality at an exaggerated level that can stop the world if replicated by everybody. Even assuming the time here belongs to me but the other side wants it, it is good enough for me to consider only the effect of that on me, and it is none of my business how it gets used.  So, I no longer maintain the positions I declared above with regard to the request I made at the beginning and that "trillion" dollars example I gave later. 

...

I applied the thinking above to the issue of differentiating  between if waiting for the corruption guy here is my choice versus if it is the result of accepting that the judges take some additional time and they decided to keep that waiting. Earlier, I considered deciding this issue as part of dealing with the judges, but now I accept considering it as isolated from me by the judges. And again this is with the assumption that I have the right to that time.

Also, the reference to the "physical and material effect" in the preceding paragraph includes the effect of being in such lacking of tangible assurances, and it is the hardest part on me. It is not like I am here waiting for the date of a promissory note I am holding in my hand. I have been kept in this status since May of 2015 (after the denial of my petition), and this additional challenge is occurring within that same lacking and builds on the immaterializing of the preceding one. 

...

                                     (Added April 1, 2024)

I am okay with taking up to June 30 to end this, but I still do not feel like I can work or do anything unless I follow that nagging thing inside calling on me to refuse anything above the offer. If I still get that I could send all of it to the IRS (and still pay the tax on the offer).  

Many times before the potential of this addition comes I have thought about how it would be good to refuse an amount equal to the offer in order to counter how this guy kept acting as if because of the amount of the offer he bought the right to do bad things to me. And here it is the opportunity to do that presenting itself to me.   

However, as if I was not offered this addition here, I still may sue the guy for anything else if I want to.

...

The way things expressed above still leave a chance for doing otherwise. So, I am declaring here that I refuse to accept any amount above the offer and if I receive such amount I would either send some of it back to the sender (For example whoever issued the check) and send the rest to the IRS, or send it all to the IRS. And I will still pay the tax on the offer as if I did not pay any of that to the IRS.

If I choose the second option above I would also try to prevent the IRS from counting that amount for any other tax I would owe, and would send any related check back to them or seek  another way to refuse it. 

...  

By as much as I would have gotten that addition had I not refused it, my refusal works better for the purpose I mentioned above. However, I am not willing to go beyond June 30 for that.

... 

                                     (Added April 2-3, 2024)

On second thought, being this close to having that addition (and especially with my history) is good enough for that refusal wish I mentioned above, and now , rather than what that last paragraph above suggests, my priority goes to ending this situation at the offer as soon as possible. This path is better for countering any potential waiting for me to reverse that refusal.    

...

Just like how I complain and criticize, it is good to acknowledge the positive, especially those two elephants in the room positives. First, going along with my offering despite how big the amount it requires, and without requiring me to counter any argument assigning what I complained of as injury to the system not me. Then came the doubling of that with  the empowerment to do this refusal and how much it can make me tell the corruption guy you owe me and I do not owe you. This is huge and taking this path is something I have been trying to push down and prevent from surfacing, not plan B.

It may be hard to believe, but, again, before its potential here, I used to think about having the capability to take double the offer, not so that I take both, but so that I take one and use the refusal of the other to counter how the guy positioned himself here in his actions toward me.

This refusal expires as soon as the matter goes out of the judges hands.

... 

The difference between waiting before and waiting after affirming this refusal intention is like waiting while breathing  car exhaust versus waiting in a garden. 

...

The potential reduction to the value of this refusal now makes me switch again and cancel that time priority choice I made earlier, and instead ask that unless there is no doubt in my capability, I should be dealt with exactly as if I have not made that refusal.

...

In the past time I wasn't struggling with just whether to accept or refuse this addition but also with whether to act on this refusal before or after receiving such addition. Even though it could be considered abnormal worrying, had I chosen the latter I would have wanted to involve the IRS in order to account for if such action would be considered as owning and giving back rather than returning.

... 

                                     (Added April 4, 2024)

I would like to add more clarity to the request I made in the paragraph that is preceding the one above. It says the following: Although I refuse any additional amount to the offer, I still want to pass all what I would have been required to pass had I not made this refusal. The purpose of this is to maximize the value of this refusal. 

Actually, I want this version to override the earlier. 

...

                                     (Added April 5, 2024)

I have zero interest in getting through the request above more time to reconsider my refusal decision.

...

If the offer and the extra amounts come through separate packages that give me at the delivery point the clear option to accept or refuse, without the total received getting above the offer, receiving the package, then I wouldn't involve the IRS in doing such refusal.

And, again, this refusal expires as soon as the court is no longer involved.

... 

                                      (Added April 6, 2024)   

Seems like I missed big when I chose to maximize the value of the refusal over disassociating myself as much as I can from accepting this situation. Therefore I am switching my choice back to having this situation end as soon as possible, and this is my final choice. Of course I realize that I already gave away any right I could have had to the time until June 30.

...

I used to think that the judges can use to balance out obligating the corruption guy to accept my offer the capability to give him  a free pass from his obligation according to the bet or challenge related to that additional amount. But this refusal disables that. Therefore, instead of this direct refusal, I transfer to them my capability to receive that additional amount. Again, the end target here is the moral balance.

...  

I remind and emphasize as strongly as I can that what I want is to exist according to the offer this situation as soon as possible. 

...

1096: Time Limits For Filing Lawsuits

Based on what I just knew, it seems that the time has run out for me to file a lawsuit on this corruption guy for a tracking device I think exists in my car and was installed for him in 2019. As usual in this country, the perpetrator gets taken care of more than the victim. And how can such ridiculously balanced laws be constitutionally valid? Do legislators think that the fourth amendment right to privacy and the fifth's right not to be deprived of life, liberty, or property applies only when a governmental entity is involved? I do not see what allows limiting them like this. 

...

One could also rephrase the second question above by asking if they think that the related amendments require from the government just that it itself should not violate those rights?   

1095:

  I mentioned in the entry dated March 5 of post 1087 how receiving signals intended to tell me when things will materialize in my situation with the corruption guy makes me feel. Here I want to also add that while June 30 still has the potential of being the date by which the matter will be resolved, I do not have much use for such signals. However, anyone wants to do that as part of a frustration game requested by the corruption guy should feel free to do it unrestrictedly. Although I realize that things may not be as clear cut and signal givers might have been themselves misled or that things have changed afterwards. In any case, all such consequences are galaxies away from having any effect on me. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------                                         

                                (Added On March 27, 2024) 

And satisfying just the offer remains good enough to end this matter.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

1094: The Same "Commentating" Issue Again

 I pointed out this more than once years ago, and here is another reminder. A little while ago I caught on Ion the final 15 or 20 minutes of an NWSL game, and the commentating was very engaging and muting the TV would have felt like muting the sounds of an action scene in a movie. Then came the second game and in this one muting the "commentating" felt like a relief from a distraction and annoyance like that of  having two persons sitting behind you who are having a conversation related to the game but away from the field. 

Usually a commenter might be considered not that good just for not expressing a sufficient level of emotion toward what is going on in the field. Ignoring or letting what is going on in the field go to the background while you talk about the bigger picture is unheard of in the world of soccer commentating (and probably sport commentating in general) and is a crime that you should not do even if you think of yourself as the Albert Einstein of soccer. Except for extremely low number of exceptions, as long as the ball is moving the commentating should be directly related to that move. Real commentators keep doing that while showing a good level of being emotionally engaged even while the playing is stuck in being interrupted at the mid section of the field. Here on the other hand, "commentating" may be horrible to the level of even letting running toward the goal with good potential of scoring be kept in the background, and even a thing as engaging as fantastic on the go shot or save by the goal keeper is unable to keep the talk at the direct level to what is going on in the field. 

1093: Further Clarifying The Tax Issue

  Because the discussion in post 1089 could have confused seeing my intention, I want to point it out here that even if what I would receive can be considered by the IRS as gift, I would still be ready to have it with its tax responsibility shifted to me. 

1092: Speaking of teaching from companies with trillians in market cap...

 .., how about a one who did and is still doing one of the most outrageous, ridicules. and extremely hard to believe things ever? I am referring  to google's translation for arabic without taking into account the little moves over the letters there. I talked about this before and about THIS exact word, and as you see, it is still there. Because of not taking those moves into account with the english letters version under that arabic word there ("rajul"), this over $1.8 trillians market cap and probably the most prominent search engine in the world has been and continues to teach people the equivalent of "man" means "leg" in arabic. 

1091: Is this really an over $2.5 trillion market cap company?

 I have spent the last two hours trying to know how to get rid off that tool bar at the bottom of the iphone and still cannot do it. I found THIS from the company itself. Reading this, I kept scratching my head where is that big and small "A" symbol? It turned out that I had to first write something in the search field and click on searching it in order to have that symbol appear so that I can click it and choose the option of hiding the toolbar. This is not the first time where it seemed that their instructions do not sufficiently go back to the root that can lead to all possibilities. Still, what I needed  was not solved with that. For example if I go to bing and click on an image then choose to view that image (I have set safari to always choose the desktop version) then the image would also be shown on a page having that toolbar. Following the process above in order to get rid off that toolbar also takes away the capability to go back to that image, and that is because the back button is part of that toolbar. 

Go to the internet and look at how common is such need from other people while the company does not seem to be caring that much. 

1090

 

308: That One Click difference

 This is related to post 307. It seems like there was an option for using the tablet without an apple account but I had to choose the option that I do not have an apple account (or something like that) first and then there would be an option to allowing to continue the setup and leave the apple account issue to be done later in settings. Thinking that all what it would do is to enable me to make one, I did not click on the earlier option. I am not trying to setup another iPad but I just did that with an iPhone and I do not think that iPads are more restrictive. Actually, even here I did not try that click until I searched the internet about the issue. 

1089: The Tax Issue

 Let us clarify this: I am assuming that I would be responsible for paying the tax on what I would receive for my case with the corruption guy.

This was my original position before finding out through that letter from the irs that gift payer not receiver is responsible for the tax. But then I read some material from the irs about the issue of whether a person should be considered as employee or contractor. It sounded like saying that the irs would look at the situation and decide based on all the outer facts rather than just how the two parties define their relationship. So, applying the same view here takes away the capability to guarantee that what I would receive can be considered as gift just because the two parties agree for it to be that. Then looking a little deeper in the matter I realized that, unlike what I said in an earlier post, whether or not I am going to be required to sign an agreement for anything I would receive, it seems like the offer I made itself as long as it was kept active constitutes a contract with an open entry point for the other party. Actually, the outer facts here seem to call for this as contract like a settlement or judgment award, and therefore taxable to the receiving party, with or without taking that offer into account.

1088: Toilet Papers

 I have pointed out before how on the subject of toilet papers the wiki article talked as if using water does not exist as option. Yesterday I saw on tv someone doing not only that level of clear denial but also adds to it an astonishing misrepresentation to others that makes you wonder what kind of a person accept sinking that low. It was in a program on Story Tv about the historical development of bathrooms and their plumbing. When the issue came to toilet papers a woman also talked about how earlier people where using other things including magazines or newspapers they read then applied for wiping in the bathroom. Then within the same context of expressing, as if water does not exist as a solution, how people before the making of toilet papers were so much in need for things to wipe themselves she said that in the middle east they use their left hands to do that and that is why you do not see lefties there. No body there or in any part of the world use the hand for dry wiping there, but they use it as part of the washing with water. 

I also once saw in that Family Guy cartoon show a joking reference to the absence of toilet papers during the time of establishing the constitution. But the fact is that you do not just go back centuries but thousands of years and it would still be the people there who can joke about the people here for choosing toilet papers over water. 

And by the way, there are lefties in the middle east.             

1087: My New Resolution

 I thought again about my situation: What is it to me to stay like this couple of weeks more? But, it again did not feel right. So, I am declaring here that by as much as I have the right to do so, I refuse to stay for even just one hour more of being contained like this in what others set for me. I am not a toy, and I no longer can tolerate  such manipulation. I have been living in such situation since the denial of my petition, and I no longer can accept the same after all the self convincing efforts I did based on that it is one time exception that would end when I present that argument I was making. I have already done so much of addressing the other side while I myself never directly acknowledged by it, carrying that whole situation on my shoulders,  and I feel very reluctant to do more of that. From now on, the interface presented to me is what counts. 

I also wondered how could someone having existence story like mine accept for himself again taking such a passive position toward such stealing and manipulation of reality? I said "again" taking into account the toying with and degradation to the system that has been going on. But there, I was supposed to be on the other side according to the challenge.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                   (Added February 28, 2024)

The focus of the top paragraph above is only on acknowledging  equal existence rather than a contained one for me. No effect of deception is part of that focus.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                    (Added March 5-6, 2024)

I have been running away from any sent signal telling me about when things shall materialize here, because I think that is insulting (I have been even avoiding entire tv channels because of that). And the reason to do that for me is even less in the past days after I already hinted at already receiving such signals when I spoke about "couple of weeks" in the top paragraph above, unless "couple" was taken as rigid beyond what it was intended to be, or the purpose of saying that was taken as being for setting a limit. 

------------------------------------------------------

                         (Added March 8, 2024)  

The top paragraph continues to express my sensitivity to the issue, but the demand I made in that paragraph is no longer active.

------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

1086

 Even though I may comeback to this case at some other time, I still want to ask here how does Zimmerman's claim of self defense fit how easily he kept reacting by showing his gun after that alleged trial?

(This is a recreation for the original post, which I  accidentally deleted today).  

1085

307: 

 The iPad Mini I just bought refuses to be setup unless I provide it with an Apple id, even though what was written on the box is that such id is needed for "some services". Then when I went to create an account filing the information felt like there is some one playing me on the other side and after spending the time with that I received the message that my account "cannot be created at this time". Here is a screenshot LINK.

...

Still trying unsuccessfully to create an Apple Id, filling the required information over and over then receiving a message that it may take a few minuets to create an account but then nothing happened. Could the whole system of government be anymore corrupt? It feels like this guy got an institution of science dedicated to his evil work and nobody goes after him. Again, the audacity of the corruption is so high that it is not enough for him to violate my privacy and know what he was not given the permission to know but he uses that information to mess what I do, and often in very direct way. 

I think that my earlier message about the security of the Mac made him hit with all his force here. I do not know how is he capable of doing this but I think it is through intercepting my connection. The software interface I faced in these later attempts to create the id is not the one I faced in the earlier part above. Also, without receiving a message telling me that the address is not available, I can give an email address in a new attempt to create an account,  even though I have already given that same address in an earlier attempt that passed through the process. This indicates that there is no depth to the system and therefore what I was interacting with is just an interface. 

...

Just tried again, and this time receive a message that my id is locked and I need to verify my identity then when I clicked on that I received a message telling me that my id is invalid or unregistered.  

...

Another trial and the that last thing happened again. Here it is expressed through screenshots: First THIS,  then after clicking on that button I got THIS. 

...

Did another registration attempt and the same thing above happened again. But then I followed a different path (not one through the Apple Store) and this path showed that same earlier interface above but this time, at 1 am eastern time, after spending my day on this issue, the registration succeeded.

1084: The difference Mac makes for security

 I do not know how long Mac OS can offer such security against this corruption guy, but I was just working on the internet and the connections were painfully slow on my Windows computer. Then, guessing that the issue could be of his work within my computer, I tried my Mac and found things normal there. I also do not know how common is this, but since I bought this Mac less than a month ago I have been getting messages that the system prevented around 160 trackers per week from profiling me.

(There was a different post here, but I took an exception from the 24 hours rule according to which I try to restrict myself, and  moved it to its own page). 

1083

 Although not much as a challenge, this continuity of my situation with the corruption guy is troubling to me because I feel as if I am being taken for granted to be ready to be left in the unknown with no acknowledgment to my existence, in exchange for better compensation. So, my preference is to have this situation ended as soon as the decision about my offer gets made.

By the way, I wrote THIS intending it to be the last time I would need to put myself in a position where I appear talking to myself with no acknowledgment to my existence from the other side.

.......................................................................................................

(ADDED ON FEBREUARY 2, 2024)

 Actually, although I may decide to file other lawsuits related to matters connected to this guy, here I refuse to accept anything beyond the offer I made. For any extra amount I may receive, I would first subtract an amount for its tax and then call on this guy to take the rest of it (This plan was already in my head when I published my book). 

.......................................................................................................

(ADDED ON FEBRUARY 4, 2024)

In case the reference to the tax in the above needs clarifying, the point is that when dealing with the IRS with regard to that amount I may choose the safety of considering myself to have owned that amount and pay the tax accordingly, leaving the matter of arguing the other interpretation to the guy.  

Also for a little better technicality, I am changing "may receive" in that part above to "would receive"

.......................................................................................................

(ADDED ON FEBRUARY 6, 2024)

On second thought, I do not like to offer the guy that if he himself chooses the continuity of the situation. Therefore I am no longer holding myself to what I said above on  february 2. Instead it is good enough for me to replace that with this: I request from the court (and count on that this request would be granted soon enough if known) to allow this guy to end this matter at my offer by this sunday (february 11). Also, except for this request, this solution also cancels the preference degree over other factors, which I gave above for this to end as soon as possible. 

.............................................................................

 

            (ADDED ON FEBRUARY 15, 2024)

Just read a letter from the IRS, dated 1/26. It contain tips for filing taxes, and one of them stated that (contrary to what my previous research which was strongly enforced by remembering that the people who were given cars on that talk show were told to pay the taxes on those cars led me to believe) the receiver of a gift is not required to pay the tax on that gift. So, how does this apply here? Doesn't my offer implies being ready to engage in a contact and that would make what I receive taxable? If so but instead what I would receive would for all tax purposes correctly account as gift, shouldn't the tax amount be deducted for the guy?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

                (ADDED ON FEBRUARY 16, 2024)

 I am allowing deducting the tax amount from the offer I made if it will be paid as none taxable gift according to the laws and regulations. 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1082: Video Streaming Services Begging To Be Sued?

 I talked before about how on youtube they without explanation before the purchase use the word "buy" to mean that the purchased video remains with them not something you would receive. And if there could be give and take in arguments about this, how about the other issue I mentioned and they also still do it? I just purchased a video that was supposed to be high definition but the max resolution option on their own website for it is 480p. The video being a high definition was even not a secondary thing. Instead I got two options for that video (an episode of Chicago PD) standard definition at 1.99 or high definition at $2.99. 

...

I just tried the same with vudu through equivalent interface and lack of warning and the result also seem to be the same. I paid for "HDX" but the quality does not look better than the 480p of youtube, although I did not see what confirms that on the former. So, it seems like this is a common practice.       

1081: Book Additions And Corrections - 5

 I actually thought the clock ticks argument in terms of beads or grains of sands accumulating with the clock ticks, and probably should have not skipped this level in expressing it.   

1080

 I talked before about how I find it unusual that people here may seek an apple rather than for example a cucumber or a carrot when one is in the mood for something crunchy. Then couple of days ago I ate an apple which was more on the crispy side of the brand I have been talking about and was reminded again of how that could lead to different evaluation. So in case that someone tasted that brand and thinks I am wrong in my evaluation, those apples probably were not ripe enough and should have been left at room temperature for couple of days or longer. I think that only when the texture of the apple feels crumbly one is really tasting that brand.   

1079: Book Additions And Corrections - 4

  What was that I did at the end of chapter four? In addition to the comma placement issue mentioned in post 1077, I first chose "...shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts..." as an example for comma separation for  prepositional and adverbial sections, even though the "and" belongs to neither of those categories, then at the end pointed out that "..shall return it, with his Objections..." would have allowed returning the bill without stating any objection had "and" been used instead of "with".

1078

 I would like to correct whatever mistaken perceptions could be  out there about my situation and point out that no body has been waiting at the edge of his seat here since I published my book. In addition, that publishing was intended to be also like filing a case to the court, and the capability to count time on it as such is included in the offer I made the corruption guy.