It seems that the authority of the court on half the offer I made to the corruption guy is dependent on the continuity of the case and that would seize to exist if the two parties resolve their problem themselves. In addition, a contract can be made requiring the party toward whom payment from that half of the offer could be required to come from the other party, to return or refuse any such payment. I am saying this in case someone wants to satisfy the offer I made to the corruption guy without the court in the middle. However, it needs to be checked with me before taking this path because I consider myself free to change and no longer accept this path at any time.
Whether taken or not, now that I made this offer I feel free to think about the Second Amendment and win anything over what I kept to myself from the offer I made to the corruption guy that could have been associated with a performance related to arguing that Amendment, at the court. And by the way, unlike what I said in a post before, if I do win, I no longer intend to return anything of that to the authority of the court again.
No comments:
Post a Comment