Hey congress members, again and again and again, open your eyes to how much what they did here is unspeakably despicable! It is hard to see how you could see yourselves as not betraying the nation because of leaving the top court with persons who have done even just a minor part of such outrageous behaviour. You are galaxies far from my world if you think that I accept such cost in exchange for resolving my situation.
===========================================
(Added January 28-, 2026)
==========================================
[[(Added November 5, 2026)
proving the good behaviour
Here is one more thing to notice with regard to applying that clause. One should be careful not to take it as making proving the invalidity of the behaviour to require proving as if that clause directly says that the judges would not be holding their offices during not good behaviour. While, as mentioned before, the latter is implied because of having that clause in the paragraph that establishes the judicial power, one should not miss that it requires proving the existence of the related good behaviour in order to have that authority. Having that a burden of proof can be fulfilled passively does not imply that there is no burden of proof. In other words, mere suspicion that a ruling is not based on good behaviour could be enough for proving that ruling is not supported by the judicial power of the united states. So, for example, here this requirement has been galaxies away from being fulfilled when it comes to a group that handled my situation and ruled on it with such cartoonish level of appearing biased.
It is also interesting to see how noticing that proving the good behaviour is required also brings much weakness to the view that "during good Behaviour" is in the first place about when rather than how holding the offices should occur instead of the other way around as argued here.]]
[[(Added November 3, 2026)
I have just noticed the switch away from daylight-saving time, and I am switching my schedule accordingly]]
[[ (Added October 27, 2026)
On Saturday I drove through the interstate and this is the second time I noticed when I try to merge that someone appears uncommonly insisting on staying on that lane speeding and careless about being in my blind spot as if targeting me personally. And even where I live, one time I stepped into the road while doing the side of my front yard and was surprised by how a car came from the back and passed fast close to me without caring about how I could have stepped deeper into the road counting on the usual way of how drivers are cautious enough not to act like that. So, you know whom I think behind these things. It is not my worrying about that what makes me write this, at least not after I took such notice, but instead it is how this guy seems to be careless about the prosecution potential here. And in case he wonders about this, yes, even that long car parked near mine preventing me from seeing the coming cars when I backup on the road after leaving that shop, several months ago, I have already guessed it as being probably his work]]
[[ (Added September 24, 2026)
And that air-conditioner thing seems to be done once more within just a little while of leaving it on auto cycling]]
[[ (Added September 15, 2026)
Hey, corruption guy, did your kid insert that very little frog through the door wall connection of my home for you?]]
[[ (Added September 13, 2026)
3- At about 2 pm I turned it on and the fan ran. I may depend on only manual on-off this time. I also noticed that, under my way of detecting if the fan is running through movement of the leaves above it, how different leaves may move because of the natural wind outside suggest that I am not in a position to detect difference in starting time like the seconds I talked about below.
2- It is now less than two hours later and I just checked and found the fan not running. Although it ran earlier, it took seconds longer than usual to start and because of that I doubted if it would keep running with the on-off auto cycling. On the other hand, after writing #1 below, I anticipated that this guy will tell those serving him around me to do it again.
1-Just tried it again at about 7 am after waiting all night and this time the fan ran]]
[[ (Added September 12, 2026)
3- The fan still refuses to run. I wonder how much more damage to the components that makes the fan start was caused by that this time when the fan was stopped first the machine kept running without its fan for some time and I did not turn the machine off as soon as that occur like I did in most recent occurrings of this vandalism. I did notice that the air felt suspiciously not cool enough but I disregarded that and neglected to check.
2-After waiting a little I turned it back on but the leaves still did not look moving then I went close to the window and directly saw the fan not running.
1-And again. Noticed the machine not cooling then saw through the window that none of the leaves above the machine are moving then came back to see the thermostat which I just moved to above 78 gone to 79 so I turned the machine off.
]]
[[ (Added July 26, 2026)
And apparently it was just done again. This time at night. Aren't they begging to be prosecuted for criminal charges here?]]
[ 5= I wonder how much of this could be the result of planning from last year that involved choosing to have the part that was damaged because of the earlier actions of preventing the fan from turning be replaced with a part that was close to failure
4= Off then on again and this time saw the fan running
...
3= After waiting a little, I just turned it on again and then went to check through the window to find the fan again not running.
...
2= I had the unit off until I turned it on less than an hour ago leaving it set at 77 while the actual temp is 79. Then minuets ago I checked and found it at 80 so I went to the room adjacent to the unit to check through the window (which is not easy to do because of the things and card boxes in the way) and saw the fan not running
...
1= In relation to the entry below, I actually first noticed the thermostat saying 80 while it was set at 77 at the time I raised it to 79. So now I wonder if this or others in the future would be done by covering the top of the air-conditioner unit with what prevent the air like for example a heavy rug. While such tactic seems not as bad for the machine as preventing the fan from starting, it has the drawback of being easily applicable at anytime without the need to detect a moment in which the fan is about to run. I am writing this to bring to attention the question of if I look through the window and find such tactic was applied and go out to correct the situation and he makes use of my being out] (The part between the brackets is being written on July 17, 2026)
[ He probably did it again like last July
I wake-up to the thermostat higher than what I have set it at (79) but I turned it off rather than go out and check the fan. After turning it back on I went out and saw the fan running. But as we know from last July not many of these are needed to make the fan incapable of starting.
I wonder how much different this situation would have been had I caught on camera through the window inside the house, in this and/or the earlier occurrences, that this the action of a person inserting an object to prevent the fan from starting?] (The part between the brackets was written on July 16-17, 2026)
Hey, scumbag, did those parents, I assume, intentionally pinch their son and daughter at Dollartree store for no reason other than to make them cry for the sake of one more of your stupid games?!
In case some are missing this, it seems that most or all of those who opposed the sinking and immoral stand of others in that court with regard to my situation are the appointees of the black president, and it seems even more of a sure thing that the main and biggest force against the other side in that court came from his appointee side.
You think that without whatever agreement made with the congress and/or the executive authority in mid last year the skunks would have been having the ability to let the guy free of his obligations if they are willing to take the consequences on themselves? But with regard to any promise or commitment toward me involving the guy, I have been taking them (and the rest in that court) as being the interface of one entity to which that guy belongs, not mere intermediary carriers for the responsibility
There is something that I have missed to point out adequately about how horrible are the fraudulent actions of the skunks involving giving the guy do-overs and new chances the way they did. While doing that for such neither my fault nor far from being unforeseeable, and, moreover, so trivial things might look unbelievably outrageous on its own if for example I and him were racing and a new fresh start was set for both of us with every do-over for him, here it is like that I have been running continuously while the guy bets that I am not able to run some distance and they keep giving him do-overs on that bet with new start for that distance while I continue running without resting between those races against that repetitive bet. And what is even more astonishing is that newer versions of the race kept requiring longer distances.
As indicated below, what he is required to do has neither material need for what he is demanding nor even sensibly open for satisfying it. It is not like if, for example, we both work in the same place and he feels offended from the red color and therefore I may get asked not to wear red everyday. Here I am in my domain; and he would be shielded from interfacing the thing to which he objects; and this interaction would not last longer than until the door gets opened. However, having argued here for my right to do what I want in my home, I now really do not care that much for actively spending the ime and energy engaging myself in such fight (especially given that I am always on daylight-saving time) like I have been doing recently. Actually, having him fits himself within my schedule rather than awakening me knocking on my door fits better as respecting behaviour.
How wonderful is it that not respecting my privacy throughout all those years has been upgraded to having the other side objecting on the basis of being offended because of private action that has no effect outside? And this is done by those who throughout all that time have been insisting on not dealing with me except through signals rather than direct acknowledgement. What a long government vacation away from constitutional rights have been taken on me here throughout all these years! Anyway, I also in general maintain that I have the absolute right to sleep any time I want inside my own home and that even doing that as intentional disregard to any person and also intentionally targeting the time in which that person would knock on my door when arriving would not relieve that person from any obligation toward me requiring that person to come to my home. I rightfully refuse to be any less than the king of my own castle. If the other side wants to deny me this right here then let us arrange to have good neutral ruling entity and have all arguments equally available to all parties. And any attempt by this guy to show me as bad here because of how much he supposedly tries to go my way here but I do not do anything of the kind in return would be weaker than even his giving-to-charity jokes which he has been chasing me with for years. The difference is that here even at the most pretended superficial level his demand involves no real need that makes sense.
Back to the bigger scene, the situation with this sleeping time issue is as if the skunks have said: Okay, we have treated him to the max like an object, and of the low value type, by choosing to involve him (despite how much he sought and tried initially to convince us to end the matter) then counting on him things done by others and no matter how trivial were their effects; and we also refused to accept that he was free to leave his house in that day of November 2024; now, where to go from here? what more can we add to the astonishingly outrageous way we have been dealing with him? Ah, we got it! This time we hold him accountable for things of his own life he does inside his home!
It should not be missed how the earlier assumed commitment from them still requires them to do honest work for me with the power of whatever their agreement with the congress have empowered them with. If you can see that then do you really miss how their behaviour screams for them to be not just removed from power but also prosecuted to the max?
Their arrogance in the wrong of flipping back on their commitment because I left in part of that day of November 2024 was apparently not enough that they upgraded it to a mind blogging of unrightful audacity condition on what I do in my own life inside my own home. And sadly the level of absence of privacy to which I have been subjected for so long made me later think that I need to adjust my intention for neutrality and miss that the top controlling fact here is not my intention but my being within my own domain. Only a crazy person would think that the connection to the other side occurring at the knocking and waiting for me to open the door justifies considering when I sleep a matter belonging to the shared domain. Actually, if anyone has a right to put a condition here it should be the visited not the visitor in order for the former not to be disturbed. That is why there is something called setting an appointment. Having this the other way around and it is the visitor who sets a condition on what the visited should be or not be doing when his door is knocked is an invention achieved by the psychotics running the top court of this country, and it shows the amount of sewage that have accumulated in their brains because of seeing themselves like God. Even before this I reached the same conclusion with regard to them believing that they have right to time after getting convinced in my argument even though they are dealing with a case they have denied. As if such condition on neutral ground is not bad enough, here they added such condition to what in which they themselves involved me despite that I requested otherwise and tried to convince them into abandoning their plan.
I emphasize again that I accept giving removing the skunks more priority than resolving my own issue.
(Added January 25-26, 2026)
By the way, HERE is how I tried before to raise potential power abuse suspicion from just few words in their opinion for the colorado bakery case.
After writing post 1171 it occurred to me how it could have coincided with some special change inside, so let me use this opportunity to give apparently much needed lesson for many about the difference between serving your ego and serving your morality. If having someone whom you owe say bad things about you, even if with the intention of taking advantage of the situation to humiliate you for having to return what you owe under such insults, and you let that stops you from returning what you owe even though you do not expect that the interaction time for returning what you owe would involve such insults then you should not be appointed a judge in even sheep court let alone the top court of the country.
