925

 Even though I was not looking for it and also avoid much of the news because of the outrageous level of fakeness and corruption there, yesterday I heard what makes me want to ask again how do some western countries accept for themselves to go after and prosecute support for Terrorism while they themselves sell weapons to undemocratic regimes?   

924

+290 (second amendment interpretation 216: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 9)

 

923

 

+289 (second amendment interpretation 216: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 8)

922: Being Just Versus Refusing Reality

 On one hand one may wonder how can that difference in earning by gender in soccer be justified by the quality of playing the game. On the other hand, it seems that most, if not all, well known tennis tournaments have the same winning prize money for men and women. If I were having the authority there, I would have made better justice my first priority. For example, I would not let how much it could be taken as suggesting men being better than women in that sport (even though the comparison is only top to top) make me hesitant to make that prize based on actual performance. That is because being just and fair is what I feel the calling for. Other than that, I am not the creator of the world and do not consider it may responsibility to replace reality with something else. I think that many people may not be applying sufficient attention to that line. Although, also to be just, I have always had the feeling that requirements are often unnecessarily reduced on women's versions of sport games and that takes away from women the capability of presenting themselves through the best medium possible for  comparing their performances with men's, and having only three sets for women versus five for men in tennis often occurs to me as one of those things.    

921: Commentating on Women's Soccer Here

I again want to ask, even assuming there is a reason for confusion here, how hard could it be to watch how commentating is done in any of the so many countries were soccer is popular and do like that? So why is the commentating on women's soccer here is unbearable like this? The first priority in commentating is what is going on on the field at the moment, not pushing that to the background and replacing it with other far from the field talk about the game and players.  There is a difference between hearing commentating on the game and watching the game in a public place while you hear two people having conversation related to the game behind you. This difference include even deeper analysis to what is going on on the field if it comes at the cost of lengthy abandonment or distraction from being with the actions in the field at their direct level. And even in the very few occasions, elsewhere, were a commentator allows itself to stray away a little bit from the field, that commentator may immediately interrupt itself with any increase in the significance in playing the game. Here you may even see a player near the penalty area and one step from passing the ball to where there is a scoring potential while the commentator continues its out of the field story as if the audience came in the first place to listen to the talk of that commentator and the game itself is the secondary supportive thing.             

Penalty in Soccer

 Watching how two penalty awards spoiled the most recent game in the current NWSL competition makes me argue against this law in the game again. This all or nothing foul system for violations inside the penalty area does not make sense but people are sticking to it as if they are under a contract to do so. A person who commits any intentional foul can also be excluded from the remaining of the game. After all soccer is not supposed to have any intense physical contact among the players. But that is not practiced. So why is it okay to mess the game with the current penalty law? 

Like I suggested before, the law for violations in the penalty area can require multiple goals by shooting from the penalty mark in order to count as one goal in the score of the game, and the determination for the number of kicks can be left to the referee under some general guidelines and limits. Alternatively, the current penalty law can be applied for only the five minutes, or some other short period, at the end, while for the rest of the time the law would depend on adding up errors in that area until the total level of violations there deserves the penalty kick award. The solution can also include a combination of those two suggestions. 

I of course did not miss how, before those signs we currently see near the end of a game declaring the amount of  additional time, leaving that to the determination of the referee was also treated like a law from the sky. And what about those video reviews which sometimes require even the referee to pause the game and attend to them personally? And imagine how much one in the past could have been ridiculed for suggesting going back in the game if an error was determined after reviewing the video while the game is still being played. So how long this penalty law will continue to mess soccer until it becomes accepted that it is essential to have a better law and probably even more essential than those changes just mentioned?

By the way, the talk about selection for women national soccer team reminds me to point out how, although they might have had good individual skills, the playing of the team in that last world cup, was, frankly speaking, horrible in being unharmonized and more like street soccer and unlike how women soccer clubs I am currently watching here seams to play as team . I do not know how one can avoid blaming the coach for that. The beauty of team playing was the first thing I noticed in women's soccer in that world cup but that was often missed with the US team. My favorite team to win that world cup was England's team (although not a fan of how tight some of their players were wearing their shirts).         

919

 

+288 (second amendment interpretation 215: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 7)

 Picking things from after the argument for the word "the" in "the security" in the preceding post, I do not know what made me wonder that far for something like this. The first comma preserves the abstraction of the two part clause "A well regulated Militia". Since an abstract Militia belongs to an abstract State, the test for the necessity of a well regulated Militia in the Amendment includes only what exist externally at the general environment and with the words "free" and "security" applying only externally. Clearly this test leads to the answer of no necessity for our time.

I may come back to elaborate on the core above but I did not want to postpone it for that. The same goes for the argument for the implementation versus concept for a Militia in the preceding post, which also was wrong. However, I still want to mention here that because of how the abstraction suffices by itself, it seems that the capitalization on both sides around the first comma is needed only for the same reason that was discussed before which is related to how the descriptions "well regulated" and "free" should exist as statuses not just descriptions for what is being described.

918

 

277

 Not wearing a face mask here, and if I were with the authority, I could have invaded Florida for that fake court which supposedly tried Zimmerman for killing Trayvon Martin. The system is so corrupt that, Zimmerman, because of the strength of the corruption force backing him, appeared so far from being really concerned about what was going on to the level of probably struggling to keep a serious face.

917

 

276

 Still proudly never wore face mask and fighting that corruption.  

916

 

+287

 Related to the preceding post, I am not okay with the level of arguing with regard to the connection for the clauses around the first comma but I posted yesterday because I did not want a potential deadline to pass without making the best argument I can. Also it is not a bad idea to give the readers more time to think about what was made while I try to add what I think is still needed.

915

 +286 (second amendment interpretation 214: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 6)

914

From Blog Corruption And The Government

275: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 14: Again The Response Looks Missing The Target

Even though there maybe a significant amount of questioning for how this virus was called as the cause of death for many of the situations that involved pre existing conditions, still if there is one thing that may answer the question in the preceding post it is that pre existing condition explanation. However, the response that is supposed to be because of this virus is again wasting energy and imposing restrictions on the general public to whom infection for the vast majority would most probably be like a passing flu. On the other hand if I were somebody with a related pre existing condition I may appreciate something that enables me to stay far from the probability of infection like a financial support for example but it would not make me alter even a little the precaution I take not to be infected by the outside having even everybody else wears breathing mask.

913

From Blog Corruption And The Government

274: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 13: Counting In That Elephant In The Room

Up to this point my conspiracy talk here did not extend to the data itself that is related to the death count related to this virus. But now I do not see a trust in any reporting out there that is capable of stopping this question:

How could an infection related disease have that many mortality cases in countries like this while not affecting even close to that many other places where infection has much bigger opportunity to spread? Look at the statistics about other countries. If this virus kills that many here with this level of cleanliness in the public environment and interactions among people, how many it would have killed at places like where I came from and other places that are even not as good as the latter in those qualities? Isn't this a joke? Like how all the consumption here for butter and saturated fat makes sense for things like heart disease and stroke to be more common here, it should be the other way around with infections. Nothing can explain this except a game and conspiracy being played at some selected countries.

912: Resetting Time Again

With regard to my personal issue at the court, even though time would not need to be counted differently from other  new cases, having noticed the option in post 905, I would not feel good without doing what I am declaring doing here and that is to go back and stay at point zero with regard to counting time, until I post declaring changing that. My intention is not to do that before making some additional input related to my Second Amendment argument.     

911: The Most Important Question

The most important question related to the approach described in the preceding post is about how much by exhausting the country and shutting it down like that we left those who died and in need for a special focus because of the virus to themselves without help as if we are in some serious situation where every person is for itself not some joke of corruption and playing around. 

910 Another Reminder About This Continued Fraudulent Joke

I want here to make another reminder about how the reasonable behaviour should be with regard to this corona virus situation. It does not appear even close to the level that needs to be dealt with by focussing on not spreading the virus to others instead of just informing the people and depending on every person to protect itself from infection. It was spinned like this in order to stop the economy.

 

909

Related to the preceding post, I actually did not forget but initially thought it is okay or ignored the issue then changed my position after reviewing myself.   

908

In the past when I talked about how I would call for starting to count time for my issue at the court if I want, I intended that to mean while it will still have the same content, time starts to count like a new case.  However, I forgot and did otherwise,  at least when I made that demand in post 903. I, of course, remember that I paused that demand, but the point here is about my attitude.

907

From Blog Corruption And The Government

273: Suffocating The People

The corruption of this corona virus exaggeration scam is at the dirty level of even chasing people on their basic necessities like groceries. Yesterday, I saw a TV short news about a woman throwing stuff out of her cart in a grocery store because she was told to put on a mask. While she has no right to do that, the stronger feeling related to the story for me was about how much she seems to be  frustrated for being chased with this nonsense to be forced against her will while all what she wants to do is just to buy food necessity.
She did not just dump her cart but instead was throwing items individually as if trying to counter a feeling that she needs to buy that thing for each of them.

906:

Even though I made it contingent on having the right to do that, I want to declare here pausing the demand I made in post 903 after I recovered my rights.

905: Bypassing The Court

It seems that the authority of the court on half the offer I made to the corruption guy is dependent on the continuity of the case and that would seize to exist if the two parties resolve their problem themselves. In addition, a contract can be made requiring the party toward whom payment from that half of the offer could be required to come from the other party, to return or refuse any such payment. I am saying this in case someone wants to satisfy the offer I made to the corruption guy without the court in the middle. However, it needs to be checked with me before taking this path because I consider myself free to  change and no longer accept this path at any time.

Whether taken or not, now that I made this offer I feel free to think about the Second Amendment and win anything over what I kept to myself from the offer I made to the corruption guy that could have been associated with a performance related to arguing that Amendment, at the court. And by the way, unlike what I said in a post before, if I do win, I no longer intend to return anything of that to the authority of the court again.

904: Remaking The Time Declaration Below

From Blog ONTC POSTS
From Blog Final And Other Courts

903: Recovering Back My Rights And Demanding A Resolution

I hereby recovers all rights I relinquished to the court years ago including the right to be told only the truth about my case and to have time counted as with any other litigant and that starts from this day. Now as much as I have a right to do that, I demand a resolution  through the offer I made to the corruption guy if accepted for the part I kept for myself, or a response back and negotiation.

902: Canceling The Position Below

Because I feel like the corruption guy is still trying to abuse the situation and play games in response to my position in the two posts below, I now can cancel that position and may accept an additional compensation even if it is because of liking my jokes, without a problem. It is much better that I am working on choosing the correct path with changing positions toward actual actions than directly with actual actions and mistakenly assume the good in this guy like this.

However, deciding not to refuse additional compensation does not mean wanting to sit and wait for it. On the contrary, if I were to be told your offer to the corruption guy was accepted for what you kept to yourself of it, do you want to end things now or wait for a chance to double that? My choice would be to end things now. Now that the issue at the court seems to be only about the level of compensation I should get and not about reacting to the wrong that happened to the system with regard to the two cases I have at the court, and there seems to be no intention for directing the part of the offer I returned to the court to some other purpose, I do not feel good about waiting, especially with the compensation issue being about an extra level that was attached to some unrelated thing not any harm or hardship I experienced. 
By the way, some at the court may think that they got some good will action from the corruption guy to give me extra time to finish with the Second Amendment (which I try not to care about and instead work on my own timing, or otherwise I feel like a beggar), while I was able to detect that my issue at the court was about to be resolved by seeing how stocks I watch went up, then detect a change in the timing for that by seeing how the pressure was brought back to those stocks and they got driven down.
The corruption guy seems to think that he would have his way with the market in the meantime without that kind of competition from me while ultimately he most probably will not pay more than what I kept for myself in the offer I made to him. He is probably right at least because I do not find it easy to think while I am in this position.     

901: Even Better

Related to the preceding post, it seems that a decision was already made months ago in which the amount of compensation beyond what I kept for myself in the offer I made to the corruption guy, was made dependant on my performance in relation to some unrelated thing.  That strongly suggests that another decision was already made regarding the compensation that is related to what was done to me. Therefore, and counting on that unless I am going to be told that this action itself can be taken as a reason for negatively affecting accepting or ruling on a case I may file in the future, if it can be taken like that, I am refusing any amount over what I kept for myself in the offer I made to the corruption guy, of any compensation amount here, as long as that refusal can be done without me trying to avoid a  potential tax effect related to that action. If forced through that tax precaution thing, I may risk being seen getting what I intend not to keep, and refuse the remaining of that additional amount minus some tax reservation in order to pay any required tax.  

By the way, now that I paid attention to the potential implication that was pointed out above, I honestly like that I knew about that first decision. It saved me from unnecessary thinking struggle.  

   

900:

This is related to my personal issue at the court. It took me a while to respect this feeling. Not only I do not want, but I want the absence of compensation for arguing on the Second Amendment; I only accept compensations here as being to  resolve the issue of the Florida case and the issue of the New York case according to the offer I made to the corruption guy, with only harm or hardship can be taken into consideration for whatever goes beyond what I kept for myself in that offer, and compensations for whatever additional harm or injury this corruption guy did to me that was related to having filed those cases. By accepting that latter thing I accept with it that such compensations can be taken into consideration for refusing and dealing with new cases related to those harms, by the final court if they reach it. 

      

899

My digestive system is still in big mess because of what I did Here. It is like the Italians telling me: We have been consuming semolina flour as boiled pasta for that much and for this long, then you come trying these other ways as if we missed or ignored thinking about such obvious things, what do you think this is? The Constitution of the United States?   

898: Another Reminder

This is another reminder to what post 892 was partly suggesting. Before adding more strain to itself for my sake, it should not be underestimated how big it is that that group  brought itself together on going along with what I kept for myself in the offer I made to the corruption guy. In addition, it has been always okay with me for that passing time to be for the sake of the system. 

However, I still do not want my position here to be a reason for refusing any petition I may file in the future related to anything outside that offer.  

897

From Blog Guns And Crimes

+285: Two Decisions

I have decided to work on my Second Amendment argument on my own time instead of seeking fulfilment of that deadline. And in order to avoid confusing situations like the past I no longer intend to keep that weekly news check I kept doing.

896

I wonder if Post +279 needed me to point out that that level of sensitivity happened after those emails that apparently were showing to me exchanging my arguing on the second amendment with resolving my personal issue at the court, by telling me that this or that judge will no longer be with the court. So if recently I was challenged to finish things on my own, it seems that I was challenged for what was already my position but got pushed away or instigated to stay away by the same challenging entity. 
The above may serve as an argument to counter any possible suggestion that signalling me about the existence of that challenge spoiled the challenge. Otherwise I am not requesting the removal of that challenge. In fact, the more the challenge is tilted against me the more a win would feel real to me. Oh, and the above is also related to giving me time to the end of June in case I need that.   

895: One Special Linguist

I have been wanting to point out this Website for sometime. I have never seen anyone else does anywhere close to understanding the work of commas like this guy.  

894

Link +284 (second amendment interpretation 213: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 5: Corrections And Improvements)

893

From Blog Guns And Crimes

+283 (second amendment interpretation 212: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 4: Better "concept" Argument )

Instead of the way I argued for that "being necessary to the security of a free State" refers to the well regulated Militia as concept only, in the section titled Connecting Through The First Comma, couldn't I just said this:

The reference to a well regulated Militia at the beginning fits any well regulated Militia but the first comma blocks that reference from connecting to the "being necessary to the security of a free State" part following it. However the latter still try to refer to the former. This leads to that the "being necessary to the security of a free State" part refers to a well regulated Militia from the closest possible point which is its concept root. 

892

I prefered to say this after a completely fine tuned argument for the Second Amendment but I do not want to risk that I may not be given enough time for that while at the same time I am making others with important issues to think  unnecessarily about this one, so let me say it now:

It is related to my offer to the corruption guy. I have thought many times about returning back to those to whom I gave authority on half that offer whatever portion I may receive from that half, again to their authority, but worried  about the tax consequences. Recently, when I sensed a potential of doing close to that without getting into a tax issue by trying to use a potential arguing about the Second Amendment connection  as a challenge I win to do that, I wanted (and still want) to take that path.    

891

From Blog Guns And Crimes

+282 (second amendment interpretation 211: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 3: I Noticed This 2 )

Something has been pinching me about using the word "actual", and I just noticed that I probably should have focussed on the difference between a well regulated Militia as an instance and as a concept, not as an actual and as a concept.  

890

From Blog Guns And Crimes 

+281 (second amendment interpretation 210: Argument For The Whole Amendment- 2: I Noticed This1 )

Since the preceding post is long, I intend not to change it even within the 24 hours I usually give myself after posting and instead point out potential issues to be corrected  in separate posts like this one.

Anyway, this is a series I call "I Noticed This" to point out that I recognized a potential issue and intend to work on it

This first one is related to the "Connecting Through The First Comma" part and is related to how I might have contradicted myself when I refused to count in the concept in the actual thing when it comes to affecting the next part but I counted it in as a reason to prevent that actual part from surviving the first comma.

Also, without the first comma the part of the Amendment before the second comma would probably be just a reference to an actual well regulated Militia not either just concept or an actual one like I said. 

889

Link +280 (second amendment interpretation 209: Argument For The Whole Amendment )

888: Originalism and I

Can't wait to finish with the Second Amendment to attack my first ideological enemy in the field of interpreting the Constitution: ORIGINALISM!

But seriously isn't being an Originalist judge is like being a chemist in a lab who do not believe in the molecule theory?

If the language is disabled like this, how can a constitution be the highest official law of the land? What other way the makers of such document have to convey to us their instructions? If that does not matter to Originalists then how limited could be their view to the constitution being in that position?

I think that if it were not for the identity issue here it would have been unthinkable that a judge takes such a view. And similar to the issue with the Second Amendment, I also include in my criticism here what could be many if not most of those on the opposing side, for what seems to be incorrect or insufficient opposition to this view because I think that internally they are affected by the same psychological factor.  

887

From Blog Guns And Crimes

+279

Related to the preceding post, I plan to finish by May 31. I could have continued to the finish line when I was posting in February, on my own, or had I taken potential signals I received as being related to a deadline instead of just a positive side (this is also one of the to whom it may concern posts). 

886

From Blog Guns And Crimes

+278

Finishing with the Second Amendment is now the main thing I am trying to do. So nobody needs to worry for me with regard to that. 

885: More Like This

Hey, this artificial recession (which did not even come in exchange for good help to those known to be at real danger of this virus) was fun. Let's play another game. How about bombing our own stuff?  

884: Dealing With Corona Virus

Imagine what could have happened to this country if it were dealing with situations that require applying the probable cause test, like the way this corona virus situation was dealt with by those with the authority (executive and legislative) at the various governments. This criticism goes both ways, for doing what is far from being necessary and not doing what is closer to being necessary. Actually, with the probable cause issue, one has only the outside-in path on suspects of crimes. That is not the same with an issue that directly affect the self like this. There was no need for this direct jump by governments to make external requirement on how people should behave here. There were no explanation why should the instinct of self preservation be seen as insufficient without external enforcement here. Using this self preservation path, the government can also provide the information necessary about risk factors (like those in the table below) to the public so that any person with riskier susceptibility to the diseases can self-identify then gets special financial support if that identification is correct. 
Look at the death of people with underlying conditions in the first table Here. Have the main and local governments in this country started yet to use that data to proactively protect the more vulnerable as suggested above? Or are they just letting them get infected, then count the number of deaths, inhibited by denial to earlier misdealing with the situation, or controlled by trying to establish a group identity through treating everyone the same way against this virus? Of course that is if the reason is not corruption to begin with. 

883

From Blog Stocks And Market

+7: No Trading Commission

I do not know when it began but when I came back to the stock market I was surprised to find that I am not charged commision for trading stocks. This is a power offered to the  the individual stock investor or trader I frankly speaking never expected it to be with other than the financial institutions. Except for cents taken when one cells shares, as exchange fee or whatever, this power can be used here to take profit no matter how low it is and it would be the same profit regardless of the number of trades. I do not know how brokerage firms are making money this way. Still, believe it or not, you may even get a "thank you for your order" message as if you bought something from them. I just wanted to point this out for whoever does not know. I do not know how many new branches Scottrade did open using the proceeds from charging me not only its regular $7 trade commission but an additional 1/2 percent of the principal amount if I buy stocks under $1.  

882

From Blog Corruption And The Government

272: The Question In Post 271

The answer to the potential for a need to generate new  objections, in the question in the preceding post, could be that objecting to management needs to be done in terms of asking them to do the correct thing related to some issue, rather than in terms of stop doing a wrong thing. This way management will enter the state of unacceptable behaviour after the first objection and will not exit that state until they remove all reasonable doubts related to the matter that gave rise to the initial objection, and therefore no further objections related to more clear wrongs associated with the same matter would be needed.    

It seems that, depending on the type of wrong, there could still be a good purpose to asking management to change even a clear wrong action before filing a lawsuit. That is because a corporation needs a purpose in order for a definition for what is and what is not for its benefit, to exist. That imply that if a corporation is registered as being for profit, for example, then any deviation from that purpose would be a wrong thing even if all shareholders were okay with that deviation. But even though it may be technically required,  it is impossible to follow that purpose to the max. Therefore I should have put my question below in terms of how much a thing is clearly unacceptable to shareholders rather than being just clearly wrong. Because otherwise management can do irreversible damage if allowed to do anything  unless they recieve an objection first.   
Back to the first part above, I might have exaggerated the technicality there. That is because what is needed could be  just to let management know that they need to correct something wrong until it is in an acceptable stage. For management to Know that there is such intention behind the objection it receives may not need a language at a contract making level like it is suggested in the first paragraph above. Nevertheless, it does not seem like a bad idea to take such a precaution. 

881

From Blog Stocks And Market

+6: CTDH: To The Courts

Seems like no way around going to the court Here. This fake CEO keeps repeating these things for the service of this corruption guy. Even the market price never hit as low as 10 cents a share.

880

From Blog Corruption And The Government

271: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 12: Correction To The Preceding Post

I should have noticed the lawsuit option earlier. That is because the only path for that that seems to be readily available argument wise is the derivative path (on behalf of the corporation) and that requires asking management to correct the action, first. Still it is not a bad idea to start doing this now in case they want to continue this closing stores everywhere game for some more time. So based on this I do not see that I can do much with a lawsuit at this time and therefore no longer sure I am going to do so . Also, contrary to what my talk about class actions lawsuits may suggests, any recovery obtained through the derivative path is for the corporation not the shareholders directly. 
On second thought, if a wrong as obvious as this requires asking management to correct their action, before filing a derivative lawsuit, wouldn't that open a potential for an endless process here? They could correct only a fraction of the problem. So, in that case, would correcting that resulted new thing also requires asking management again to correct their action? If no, then wouldn't that be based on that it is an obvious wrong? So why was it required to ask management to correct their action toward that first obvious wrong at the start? 

879

From Blog Corruption And The Government

270: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 11: Big Conspiracy, Bigger Response

That what could happen to those business accomplices if their shareholders sue them for their closing or lowering their businesses without a reason like this, especially department stores. What could be better than suing for your benefit while doing good to the nation by teaching corruption a good lesson? If they want to argue back that they were following executive orders, they should be asked about why then they did not challenge those orders at the courts. But shareholders need to be very careful about what lawyers they select for class actions and even then they may need to very carefully question the actions of those lawyers and research carefully if they are really in their best interest. Then the cases should be followed all the way to the supreme court if needed.
Although anyone can get in a similar position by buying shares of those companies, I still do not feel good toward not using the authority I have here as a shareholder, against this corruption, after all the criticism I did to those in the government who do not stand to corruption despite how this country desperately need that. So although I do not wish to add more things to this kind of my to do list, especially with the special impediment I get from this corruption guy, I think that I am going to file at least one derivative lawsuit against  one nationwide department store. It may not contain much more than telling the court hey look no reasonable person can see this widespread closing to make sense. 

878

From Blog Stocks And Market

+5: Macy's (M)

Yahoo just deleted this post of mine from their Macy's (M) Stock "Conversation" Board (Corruption guy did not let it stay for one hour):   

I cant see how they can justify closing their stores everywhere like this because of this corona virus. I intend to send them an email about potential lawsuit because of such unjustifiable action that is not in the benefit of their shareholders. I think that every big chain retailer closing their stores everywhere for no reasonable justification needs to be also warned like this. I cannot see any other reasonable explanation for these actions except the participation in a conspiracy to magnify this corona virus thing for the benefit of some corrupt wealthy entities, to negatively affect the stock market including their own stock and shareholders.  

877

From Blog Corruption And The Government

269: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 10: Flipping It Back

I wonder if the participation of businesses in this game and  their conspiracy on their own shareholders by not running, or closing their stores, can be flipped back on them with lawsuits. For example, how can those big chain retail stores that closed their stores everywhere counter the argument that that cannot be seen as being done in good faith for the benefit of their shareholders?

876

From Blog Corruption And The Government

268: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 9: The Smooth Cooperation

Do you really think that if there were not a big nasty conspiracy behind the scene, there would be this much acceptance to close businesses, by their owners? Are they really that convinced to make such sacrifices because of a reason as weak as this? Because they are ordered to do so?  I think that if this situation were real and many businesses are themselves not part of the conspiracy, you would have seen lawyers representing companies camping overnight at the courts  to object on receiving such orders, especially the big companies. Actually, here for example, not only that I never heard about refusal and enforcement for those orders, I am still not sure we have enforceable orders in that regard to begin with.

875

From Blog Corruption And The Government

267: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 8: I Warned You

For whoever honestly not trying to burden the country and create artificial recession to help the wealthy corrupt have their way with the stock market (Although this aim itself could be a minor thing in comparison with not implementing the targeted protection, pointed out in the preceding post, for the two more vulnerable groups, instead of this mess and wasting of effort and resources while letting that number of deaths occur in those two groups) : I warned you. I told you that although the falsification that is going on around me in relation to my issue with the corruption guy is less than a joke in its effect on me personally, how can you be not worried that similar games could be played with more serious issues? It seems like it did not take long for the result of that encouragement to lead to this unprecedented level of country wide misleading and  fake show.

874

From Blog Corruption And The Government

266: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 7: Choosing The Harder Path

From as soon as it was recognized how it is less likely for this virus to be deadly for other than those with pre existing health conditions and the elderly, why didn't the protection be focussed on this group? We could have pointed out that fact to the public then asked people with preexisting medical conditions to come forward in order to protect themselves. In addition to the less restrictions on the rest and less burden on the economy, those two vulnerable groups could have been better supported financially and that in turn would support the effectiveness of this path of dealing with the issue. 

Nobody was arguing against the quarantine for the infected. So why was there such emphasis on dealing with the issue in terms of not transferring the virus instead of not receiving the virus? Why the clear and stronger path of having one taking care of himself was replaced with the more confusing and weaker path of taking care of others? Why choose what is much more undefined, and more dependant on morality here? Job adds, for example, as much as they can provide an enticing pay, are very far from from showing this self serving information in the background to the public serving, like here. It seems that the harder to implement path was intended here to magnify the problem.  
Even without being sure about that virus related thing, mentioned at the beginning, we should have looked for if there is enough probability to make the path described here our next step instead of jumping directly to or  continuing what we are in now. 

873

From Blog Corruption And The Government

265: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 6: Market Data

Even aside from how a pandemic may have just a transitory effect on the economy, the preceding post should not be taken as accepting the economic data resulted from this artificially affected economy as belonging to the original. It is beyond ridiculous to tell businesses to close and people not to go out unnecessarily, then bring data like the unemployment filing and retail sales as representing the real economy like they do without those directives . So despite how the related news may be presented in a form that suggests a direct link between this corona virus and some economic data, one may need to pay attention to the intermediate link mentioned above.
By the way, I wonder how many of the business owners or mangers, especially those at the big corporations, are so cool about closing their businesses, because of the relation they have with those who want to affect the stock market with this corona virus thing.   

872

From Blog Corruption And The Government

264: Corona, Corruption And Conspiracy - 5: The Pandemic Underneath

The whole country was hijacked like never before in its history and got its economy legs broken, for no reason except to serve the corrupt forces with the financial power in bringing the effect of the resulted artificial recession to the stock market. 

You people think that with a tyranny system you get a manual that shows you how to judge everything the government does or an alarm that sounds when the action of such government is not really intended to serve the people? Many times a tyranny government justifies oppressing its people with a purpose lacking complete proof for being misapplied, more than the purpose claimed in our current situation here lacks such proof. All what you get left with there is just the sense of not finding what is being done sufficiently reasonable and making much sense, which you cannot afford to ignore.        

871: Taking A More Definitive Position

Suggesting that I could be just questioning those stay at home and business closing corona virus policies is not okay with me anymore. I want to state clearly that they are wrong. 
What if we do not take these precautions but later suffer sever consequences because of that? The answer to this worrying is that I am not arguing the direction to the end of the path of dealing with this issue here. Sometimes a problem needs to be dealt with through a step by step process with each step taken as an input to decide the next one. I am just saying that at this stage, things are far from justifying those policies. They look as reasonable as stopping people from traveling or commuting because sometimes car accidents happen.

870

From Blog Corruption And The Government

263: The Sewage Called Capital One

Look at This on the go corruption of this company. There was nothing different in my login and even if there was I never signed to two step verification with them and even if I have signed for that I do not use this number because it is a landline not a mobile number. This sewage itself does all its communication with me through an email address which is now replaced with a phone number I never use with them and for a process I never chose to begin with. This is something that suddenly appeared from nothing. It is not  the not recognizing the computer verification which I always use for it that same email address to which this sewage itself communicates all things to me which is now not even given as option. This whole message shown in the link is entirely new to me and I have never seen it or even seen the like of it anywhere else before. Because they are excluding my email for their "verification" as if they are my email provider and therefore phones are the next degree in verification. But they made it on the go for this other sewage, the corruption guy, because I just sent email to the company called Phone Power about the shown phone number telling them that I will inform my credit card company about how one cannot delete his credit card information on their website (I wanted to do that after requesting cancellation). So this sewage made the other prepare all this on the go for me in probably less than 2 minutes.

Now I cannot access my account there even if I just want to end any relation with them unless I tolerate them forcing this on me and this sewage forcing his will again and again and again.
Also, if I click that I do not have access to those options they require me to call them.  

Before, this sewage company disabled my card while I am far in a different city but I continued with them trying to give things another try.

I just spent over two or three hours frustrating on merely accessing an account I have for absolutely no lacking on my part.