Related to the preceding post, it seems that a decision was already made months ago in which the amount of compensation beyond what I kept for myself in the offer I made to the corruption guy, was made dependant on my performance in relation to some unrelated thing. That strongly suggests that another decision was already made regarding the compensation that is related to what was done to me. Therefore, and counting on that unless I am going to be told that this action itself can be taken as a reason for negatively affecting accepting or ruling on a case I may file in the future, if it can be taken like that, I am refusing any amount over what I kept for myself in the offer I made to the corruption guy, of any compensation amount here, as long as that refusal can be done without me trying to avoid a potential tax effect related to that action. If forced through that tax precaution thing, I may risk being seen getting what I intend not to keep, and refuse the remaining of that additional amount minus some tax reservation in order to pay any required tax.
By the way, now that I paid attention to the potential implication that was pointed out above, I honestly like that I knew about that first decision. It saved me from unnecessary thinking struggle.
No comments:
Post a Comment