1146: At least for the sake of respecting reality and facts-3:

(Added July 14, 2025)

Having this situation continues to this day seems by far much more deserving to be considered unforeseeable than any of those jokes they have been counting for him. So if it is as okay as they have been practicing it that compensating one side can come from the other even if the unforeseeable thing did not come from the latter, how much credit have I accumulated because of such prolonging to this situation (Just in case I am being misunderstood, I have been using the word "credit" here for countering any more of what may make them give this guy more time (or take more time from me))?

The prolonging of the situation is on its own against me but what I was focussing on above is its effect on me with regard to the bet through exhaustion and discouragement. And now it seems that they added this recent time extension into even their summer recess for the guy (or took more time from me) because of a recent involvement by congress, counting that as unforeseeable as if we were at home playing and not in what is connected to a legal matter and being handled (or unbelievably mishandled and abused) by part of the government. Actually, it should add to my credit having the disappointment of seeing such involvements not ending this matter on what I felt like two dates set then changed to what we are in now.      

(First Posting)

INSTEAD OF ARRANGING FOR THAT EXTERNAL EVENTS FALL WHEREVER THEY FALL OR CONSIDER IT IMPLIED  THEY SEEM TO HAVE LET THAT LOOSE AND BEEN ENJOYING GIVING TIME EXTENSIONS TO THE GUY IN REACTION TO FORESEEABLE OR EVEN TRIVIAL EVENTS FROM THE OUTSIDE AND DESPITE REPRESENTING A SIDE IN DEFAULT, NOT FREE TIME. 

 The bet could have been itself about guessing the delivery date and I get that emailed to me and that would still be foreseeable because it is an open environment. Also, if they count that much effect for knowing the delivery date because of the encouragement associated with the success it brings, where is my credit for the discouragements resulting from the disappointments associated with cancelling those dates despite the signals that were given to me about them earlier? Actually I should get discouragement credits for such cancellations because of that reason if those decisions were correct or because of the decisions themselves if they were wrong (those reasons could also be switched).

And one could argue for such credit based totally on the questionable (allegedly) signal itself and that should follow from the decision itself whether it was right or wrong. The explanation for the right case is that if the event was unforeseeable to the guy then it was also unforeseeable to me and I am going to carry the burden of the reaction to its being unforeseeable.

But here is a much bigger objection.  Even if those signals were unforeseeable to the guy, how much can you take from one side to compensate the other side because of things affected the latter from the shared environment? Isn't it foreseeable to a party entering such contest that its compensation for unforeseeable things that may affect it from the shared environment could be minimal because it requires taking from the other side for no fault? 

Also, while one would expect difficult negotiation after those alleged unforeseen things for the guy, they kept passing them easily to express their power for positioning themselves as God to me, the guy continuing with his usual psychotic behaviour toward me while they join him into that because of my book.