Because those in this court are themselves in default and/or representing a side in default here, looking at what they are doing should not stop at how much time they are taking but instead must go into the details of what they are doing to solve the issue and how much sense it makes, and I do not know how their plan here with its unjustified demanding for such absence of environmental interference and allowing them that much time extensions and do-overs counts as serious work or good effort. I wonder how many if any other judges justifies that like them.
I was led to the above while thinking about how despite targeting me with their insanely bad doing it is themselves whom they are lowering with not only their continuous failure of what they on their own had set themselves to do but also with the reasons for those failures and their ridiculously impractical and made more difficult for no reason plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment