First they brought from nowhere that satisfying the obligation to pay me the original amount can wait even if they read my argument and find it convincing. Then they built on it that the guy share their time with them and therefore the bet doubling the offer remains in play. Then under those circumstances and when the time given to the guy was about to end they gave him extension because while watching TV someone gave me a signal about the specific day the guy should deliver his obligation, counting the thing on me and showing either their unjust ruling or how much their work was not serious because of not telling him earlier that he needs to take such possibility into his account. Isn't it wonderful how the environment that has been that much under his control to the level of faking presidents and government procedures for so long now counts on me? Then at late November they decided to extend the matter to the new year supposedly to give me better tax time but weeks after crossing to there they gave the guy extension of several months more because of a reason as a joke as having a news shown to me about the going fake president close to the inauguration of the coming fake president, and even though as a signal about how long the thing would continue it could be also against me because the date that had been set for delivery was more than a month away. Then despite how all the previous incidents should have prepared them they seem to have given the guy another extension because while I was shopping online on May 28 a Walmart item showed me a delivery date of June 3 which was supposed to be their delivery date. Now I am unable to even guess what could be the reason for crossing into even their summer recess. Is it because I thought congress could have became involved here and because of that I might have guessed the earlier set delivery date (#56738946587463864792) and that is not allowed for me just like a signal about it is not allowed? Or is it just the feeling of empowerment and the guy could get another extension if I hear a song or see an athletic performance with that kind of effect? Or what?
The above was just a fast summary.
By the way, I want to go again to what I said in post 1141 and ask what makes this guy demand that much no environmental interference other than that they positioned themselves to him like God in that everything falls under their accountability and there are no external factors to them? A tennis player would get nothing from the referee if he complains about the wind. Why is it different here to this ridiculous level? Also, their position after I presented my argument that they had such a pre-cut time allowing for even postponing satisfying the offer obligation despite that they had denied the case strongly supports the same conclusion.
No comments:
Post a Comment