Is there a reason for the continued existence of the ineligibility of naturalized citizens to the precedency position, in the constitution? This country is far from being that new place in the world and therefore need some thing like this to be recognized as a state on its own. Also, the overwhelming majority of people with voting rights here are born in this country and they would still be able to choose refusing a person based on being not born here if they want. But the issue here is with the stigmatizing of that constitutional exclusion. Even for just my own sake if I were on the other side here I would still question discoloring with something that is not even serving a practical purpose, like this, the purity of the equality shown with all other eligibilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment