(Added July 4 , 2024)
I again demand to receive what the other side owes me and points out that time counts at the minute level here and that satisfying this demand can also be done on holydays.
----------
To begin with, could this situation been any crazier at its start? They on their own brought an additional compensation issue and then made it hold them down from processing the resolution of the original one. And now they are extending this craziness from earlier than two thirds of their term ago to beyond the end of the term, despite how uncommon this is.
-------
Despite preferring not to do that, I need to temporarily interrupt the flow of my posting here in order to make this adjustment:
With one difference, I am here reapplying the same plan related to refusing or accepting beyond the amount of the offer depending on if it requires from me a separate depositing action or not. The difference is that I would follow this plan only when activated and the Court has the choice to activate it but the corruption guy does not. I would depend on what is conveyed to me and declare that here. I am declaring this as a promise, but I still keep the power to cancel or change it anytime I want, with the effect of such cancelation or change starting 24 hours from as soon as it becomes posted.
--------
(Time: 2:05 pm EST)
The plan above is canceled, but as set there this cancellation will not take effect until the passing of twenty four hours from the time of posting this.
----------
Hey corruption guy, whether you do that trying to play the stick and carrot with me or it is a signal for a real thing know that it has no effect on the morality reason here. In other words, I am not going to tell myself to accept an insulting situation if it would last for only a short time. In other words once again, I am not faking my consideration for the morality issue here.
(Added July 3, 2024)
It is now July 3. So why haven't the other side yet pay me anything it owes me according to the offer?
By the way, anyone conveys that at any moment I failed that abstinence challenge is not conveying the truth (Although the challenge is at the detection level, I took it as if it requires complete abstinence).
-----------
For the time to June 30 I convinced myself that I am in continuation to the original way my situation has been dealt with and that other people with cases often also have no knowledge when shall their cases get decided within that time frame until it occurs. Now, I do not accept being left in the unknown nor without direct communication acknowledging my existence, even in exchange of receiving double the offer amount the next day.
---------
I demand the satisfaction of the obligation toward me to occur as soon as possible. Time counts at the minute level and this applies on holidays as well.
-------
If there is a real thing here, I need it to materialize at the closest time that can be done, and I refuse to exchange this for trillions more later.
(Added May 13, 2024)
In case the word "that" confused it, the June 30 date above refers to June 30, 2024 (Added July 3: According to the change of position that have happened after posting this, "below" replaces "above" here)
(Starting Post)
Unless there is a disagreement on that June 30 is the deadline to resolve my issue with the corruption guy, I have no interest in getting signals telling me when this resolving shall occur.
No comments:
Post a Comment