1122: Insoluble fiber may need more attention

 I do not know if it is just because I had a period in which I consumed too much psyllium husk (as part of coconut bread making) or that ignoring the type of fiber is not that much a good advice, but I have very recently focussed on consuming much more insoluble fiber and by as much as I can no soluble fiber or resistance starch (although not as much restriction with the later because of my rice addiction) and I became with healthy bowel movements like I have never been for a long time. I do not know if others need to take the same measure but they may need to pay more attention to their need to consume insoluble fiber, because it seems like most of the fiber around us is of the soluble type. Coconut flour is one of the exceptions (although that apparently was not enough to counter the amount of psyllium husk I used to take with it in the coconut flour bread I used to make) but recently I have been adding oat hull insoluble fiber (sold in packages) to the bread I make from regular flour (although I now think that I may not need to lower that because I also began to consume too much sesame seeds (of the hull not removed type) which are also high in insoluble fiber).          

1121: Driving People Crazy With Me

(Added November 3, 2024)

While the first two have more conformity with the outside but were not good, THIS has much less of such conformity but I consider it good.    

 (Added October 31, 2024)

Now I switch my evaluation to neither is good. I have better to represent both cases below, but I brought those because of the minimal change in facial expression. Anyway, HERE is one on the good side from a video made days earlier in 2017 .

                            (Starting Post)

THIS is a combination for two snapshots I took for myself from a video made in 2017. They are just three seconds apart, yet my evaluation says that I look good in one but not the other or at least that one is much better than the other.

1120: Women Ushering New Era In Soccer

 Every time I go back to watching more men soccer I again feel impressed about how much soccer was like just a group of instrument players sitting together but women, especially the NWSL, made it an orchestra. And this goes on top of their competitiveness in individual skills. They are showing soccer as entertaining to a level that was far from the world and the like of which a rare occurrence. Even within this short history of being under attention, matches played at a level that may make them called match of the century or something of that sort on the men side are passed on like a regular thing here.

I wrote this while watching Real Madrid vs Barcelona men's match of 2005, and except for few moments of individual skills it is more boring than NWSL matches occurred in the hot weather even though that one had occurred on November 19.

1119: For A Cleaner Soccer

 I have also talked about this before. The soccer I am familiar with does not require the capability to resist pushing applied to you beyond the shoulder to shoulder contact, and I do not know how one could generate enough force to make the other person fall or lose balance if it is truly just shoulder to shoulder contact. To me it is all about the skills and not even a little bit about body strength and stability against challenging forces applied by other players. Unfortunately, it seems like some referees allow such force applications and thereby killing true soccer talents affected by that. And although there could be a difference on this, I also do not see a place in soccer for extending to the side the hand intentionally for preventing the other player from getting to the ball. 

-----

For that arm extending thing, it seems like a technical rule can be made to solve a big part of the issue, and that rule is not to allow such extending if the underarm angle is over 45 degrees.

1118: NWSL Season Period

(Added October 28, 2024)

In addition to better dealing with the weather, dividing the off period into two, one for winter and one for summer, seems to also be a good solution for the exhaustion issue. I do not think that having all that period in one chunk is needed for recovery. I wonder what the players themselves think. I also would understand  if a majority of the players say that they prefer to take the whole off period in summer because they see that avoiding the hot weather is also the best way to avoid exhaustion.     

(Added October 27, 2024)

To be fair, I think the effect of the kind of weather especially the heat and humidity need to be taken into account for evaluating performance in both genders soccer. I even read Yesterday about how Maradona objected to the time assigned for the match of 86 against England and was labeled trouble maker because of that.   

(Added October 16, 2024)

Are you kidding me? What a change in performance for the matches of August 23 to 31 (which is what I am currently at) in comparison with that during the hot weather period! And, of special interest to me is how the defense is more active and has much less, if any, of those pausing moments. Most if not all the goals I saw in this period are the result of the attack performing better than the defense rather than the defense having that lacking.     

 (Added October 15, 2024)

If the physical activity itself is not enough to keep one worm in winter, there is also the option of wearing more or thicker clothes (although current FIFA rules may need to change to allow more options for that). But what would you do in hot and humid weather? Carry your own air-condition machine with you? Also, does it have to be that all winter is avoided while all summer is taken? The season could for example skip December, January and mid June to mid August. In addition, the scheduling could be required to be by as much as possible for that places closer to the south to have matches during the colder months and places closer to the north to have matches during the hotter months. 

However, as I said before, I have not seen before soccer matches played while the sun is still strong like I saw that in the NWSL. Avoiding UV danger is clearly even more important than playing in comfortable weather.             

(First Posting)

 I have talked about this before and here is another reminder. I wonder how much when making any tradeoff here there was careful and sufficient taking into account for how much hot whether affects the quality of the playing. Frankley speaking, in general, the quality has deteriorated from probably mid May, while in the matches of August 23 (which I am currently at) it seems to have made a big leap for the better. 

By the way, how about the goal at around 1:25:26 video time of THIS  match? 

1117

 Hey scumbag, stop making my computers overheat like crazy.

1116: Those Green Cards in Volleyball

  (Added October 20, 2024)

Just want to bring to attention that players representing undemocratic countries may not have the option to make such admissions even if they want to do that. 

                                            (Starting Post)

 While commentators keep mentioning that there is a prize for the team who wins the most of them as if the amount of that prize  is really worthy of consideration, I feel no doubt that the players who make those admissions would have done so with and without any prize because they do it from a moral ground and for their win to be real not fake.   

1115: Confused about the offside rule..

 ..in soccer because you often see goals counted even though they seem to be obvious offside? So was I until yesterday after I found THIS site and read point number 3 there.

1114: What kind of Soccer Referee is This?!!!!

(Added September 20, 2024)

Probably as a response to the actions of the one mentioned below, the referee of THIS match also acted horribly and one sample of that is what happened at around 35:40 in video time.

(Starting Post)

(initial version of this post had the incorrect link)

 Go to 58:40 (video time) of THIS match and watch what happened within seconds then also continue to 1:00:30 to see more of the horrible shameless biased ruling of this so called "referee". I actually was watching the Spanish commentating version of the match but switched to this one to see how those commentators would react and found another horrible shameless behaviour in that they did not point out the facts anywhere as strong as that should have been. Both of the first and second violations seem clearly worthy of red cards not just yellow. 

And HERE is the youtube link to the same match with the first violation occurring around 59:20 video time. 

I also remember this same referee giving that Sullivan girl of North Carolina Courage just a yellow card on an action that was like playing Judo to take the player of the opposing team down. 

1113

 I am not sure if I can continue adding intellectual material to my book or that this time I would be taken to Guantanamo.  

1112

 The scumbags running the electric company of where I live seem to being again in service for this scumbag by cutting the electricity on me even without any weather justification.  

1111: Book Additions And Corrections - 7: Subjects Having Commas

(Added September 5, 2024)

I do not know why I said that other exception reverses construction direction. Instead, what the relative pronouns mentioned do is like providing a copy to substitute the content of the preceding segment and therefore the connection of the content following it within the segment of the relative pronoun can be internal. Therefore that segment would stay in its place and so would the comma separating it from the verb if that segment is the closet to the verb.

-----

I just changed the main title of this post. 

(Added September 3, 2024)

 I confused things below by explaining them through the construction in the direction of reading rather than the construction in the direction of building. In other words, I should have started from the first comma separated segment and worked my way to the one closest to the verb while along the way take account of the kind of the connecting words if they indicate separation (as in the first exception below) or reverse direction (as in the second exception below). 

When the subject on its own has one or more commas then it must also have a comma separating it from the verb or otherwise just the closest segment to the verb would be the subject. The question is if it also should be handled from its mere thought or not.

(Starting Post)

 Despite how often it has occurred to me when dealing with subjects that have one or more commas other than the comma separating them  from the verb that there is no existence according to just the mere thought there (I used to call that "handling the subject from its mere thought" but I now intend to adjust that understanding), I couldn't understand why until yesterday (technically today). As mentioned at the start of chapter four, outside the subject-verb-object relation, comma separated parts have dependency in existence on each other that goes in the opposite direction to reading. So here the existence of another comma in the subject implies that the part next to the comma preceding the verb does not exist before completing the construction of all parts of the subject, and doing that would dissolve all commas including the one separating from the verb.

So based on this I have erred below and erred similarly in my book.  

However, there is no dependency in existence among comma separated parts intended to survive separately as in with connecting through the "or" or "and" (a list is an example of that). 

Another exception I am taking from the  writ is about the use of the relative pronouns "who" , "whom", "which", "what", "that" because they reverse the direction of the construction.    

1110: Book Additions And Corrections - 6: The good Behaviour clause

 (Added September 1, 2024)

The below is probably wrong, and I am working on it.

-----------

(Original Post)

The comma separating the verb in "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour" has a role I missed there. Handling the subject here from its mere thought existence prevents targeting the identities of the judges. This is the technical way to do the like of if I for example take my car to a repair shop and say that the repair person should finish by tomorrow with my focus being on only that my car should be done by then regardless of who shall be the repair person. Similarly here because of this comma this clause is not about which identity would do a Behaviour that is less than good and which would not. Instead this clause is just tells that dealing with cases according to this condition is required from the system in general and that only this way of behaving is supported by the authority given to the judicial branch according to the constitution. 

What also follows from the above with even bigger surprise is that the appointment of federal judges being for life is not something required by the constitution writ, and that they can be removed even if they have never behaved other than good Behaviour. One also should not miss how this understanding provide much better fit for why adding "during their Continuance in Office" was needed. 

1109: Vollyball For Mixed Heights

 (Added August 21, 2024) 

Even with the way it is now, there is no comparison between it (or any other sport I can think of ) and basketball in how much being taller can determine who wins. Here the net is high but the target is all the floor. Basketball on the other hand targets one point and that point is held at the top.

------------ 

(Original Post)

I mean big difference in height. To do that we simply replace the net with two or more ropes or bars each one is assigned to a height range. For example, with two ropes, the shorter players are permitted to pass the ball between the two bars but the taller are not. Although the latter are still allowed to block using their bodies without their arms the area between the two bars.  

1108: This Situation

(Added August 27, 2024)

Hey scumbag! Never again disables my hotspot, as just happened now,  or my mobile connection itself (which is the only way I have to connect to the internet) as happened yesterday.       

(Added August 26, 2024)

Actually, although it may seem tilted more toward one side and the behaviour in general, "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour" requires from the congress that for each individual case it should not let that case be handled with bad behaviour from its judge.

(Added August 24, 2024)

Let's not kid ourselves. Regardless of how this situation ends, the question of impeaching and removing at least several of those at the top court for what they have done here and in that Colorado cake case is, to say the least, very seriously presenting itself, unless the Constitution is itself not taken seriously. And one also should not miss that the Constitution requires good not just valid Behaviour from them.      

Also, amending the Constitution to have term limits for judges of this court is another question worthy of serious consideration, and one version of this is to make the change occurs in parts like the way the Senate was established.   

(Added August 18, 2024)

Oh, and I also forgot below to mention the breaking and entering to my car.

(Added August 17, 2024)

And by the way, my objection to the extra time taken here did not even include the problems with his own compliance with the conditions and restraints on his behaviour according to the deal he has made. It has been like joke to him to the level of not just crossing but staying in violation of my online and communication or car traveling privacy and being free from any not permitted intrusion which are right that belong to me even without any other behaviour obligation imposed on him according to the deal in which he is involved. And again the audacity of bugging my car for tracking (as substitute for tracking me through my cell phone which I switched to carrying it separated from its battery) despite all the public complaining I did against such tracking by him feels mind boggling.   

(Added August 16, 2024)

This low life is back again to messing my things and not letting me live. Here is the situation with something I wanted to buy. First, about two week ago, I visited the website of the store carrying it then went there but I did not find but a single item of it and not exactly of the variety I came for which the store according to its website has two of it in that location. This time I decided to buy it on line and pick it in the store at that location. So I ordered it yesterday and  everything looked okay and today as expected I received an email telling me my order is ready for pick up. But when I arrived there they told me that a mistake happened and they do not carry that item in stock even though online they say they do carry two of it. I had to do driving around for two more hours to find the other location and buy it from there (which of course also could have been prevented). With this thug watching every thing I do online and tracking my car when I go out what fighting chance do I have?

(Added August 12, 2024)

Instead of the "but without the things against gays" below I  should have said "but without the things against homosexuality".

By the way, does the requirement that the President should be born in this country really look sitting well among all such Anti-discrimination laws? And like I said before, unlike the earlier time and its uncertainty about the kind of demographic growth this country would experience, now having such majority for those born here makes this requirement hardly serves any purpose but pure discrimination on the basis of the eligibility for that position.  

(Added August 9, 2024)

I think I need to rethink my position on the issue below and if it turns out that I am wrong then I would owe big for the criticism I have made below and earlier on this issue. 

----

While rethinking the point I made below I noticed an even more direct and easier one in the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act which says (or said at that time):

“It is a discriminatory practice and unlawful for a person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from, or deny to an individual or a group, because of disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation.”

Unlike wedding cakes, fitting the two other requested cakes under "the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services,..." does not seem as direct. This was not a case of for example a publishing place that accepted publishing for one side but not the other. It was about a cake making place. For such a place not to sell a wedding cake would make one wonder why is the shop even open then. On the other hand it is very reasonable to see the business of such shop as intended not to get involved in a level  of ideology not needed for that business to run and therefore "the goods, services..." of that business should be defined according to this limitation. 

----

It should not be missed that the two later requested cakes require a level of ideology involvement that crosses expressing being correct to expressing the other side as wrong. Actually, according to what I read every visited shop accepted to do the Bible but without the things against gays.  

(Added August 6, 2024)

Speaking of missing the environment and the context, yesterday I shocked myself again by reading in the opinion of that Colorado cake bakery case. Who would honestly and in good faith equate the original cake making request with the other two? It is clear that the root focus of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act is the existence of the person. Had the first two filed a lawsuit to have marriage legal recognition they could have won or lost but they certainly would have not been seen as lacking standing to bring the lawsuit which is what the person who brought the two other cake requests would have faced had he filed a case to undo legal recognition of gay marriage had it been already there.      

(Added July 29, 2024)

Playing Being God

So, those judges had been set to receive from as soon as I present my argument a precut time period equal to the length of their term even if the argument convinces them earlier in that period? Who had understood in this way the earlier situation which lasted over 8.5 years and involved my very early post petition denying offer which culminated to setting the final stage being having those judges convinced in my second amendment argument? I do not care if they are the judges of the highest court of this country or the earth or the galaxy; it is clear that they had/have no right to such time, and this has been a broken promise since  very shortly after they became convinced in my argument.  

(Added July 27, 2024)

The demand pause period has expired and now I, again, demand receiving the obligation the other side owes me and do not accept any delay regardless of the additional compensation I would receive for that delay.

------

You think I do not have the right to the time yet? Then answer in the comment section here the  arguments I have made for that.

------

The shame and disgrace of the promise breaking the other side has done to me here is of a cosmic size that can eclipse the whole galaxy.

----

Had this same behaviour that occurred from the judges of the highest court instead occurred from an ordinary person, how much that person would have been spared the view or even being told: YOU ARE A WORTHLESS PROMICE BREAKING THUG! 

------

And how about all you other participants and those who played along? Could the matter been anymore public and involving more government officials? This is how you understood the earlier environment and commitment toward me, right? I present my argument in the middle of December and it gets read and convinces those judges but the other side can remain not fulfilling its part of the deal to July and we are still counting, right? You were not waiting for me to present that argument so that the situation ends but so that we start a new waiting of this long or more even if the argument does its job that fast? Nothing new here, right?

-----

And it is not just the failure to deliver but there is no communication attempt to explain or  even just tell me about a need to extend time either. That refusal to address me specifically and give me direct acknowledgement kept unbelievably strongly anchored like nothing else since the denial of my petition in May 2015? Not even writing a book those ruling on me now are not able to bring the like of it in a million years changed that treatment to me even once. And even just for simple reasoning, how many here have wondered what purpose other than joining this corruption guy in his psychotic world for denying my existence does it serve that I do not get a direct acknowledgement but still get all those signs and signals and how obvious are those government faking efforts? 

--------

Even with what I have already argued aside, what should one make of those judges here? That they are not honest here or that they are really facing argument from the corruption guy they cannot answer? With regard to the latter, what kind of low competency makes them spend all the time they had spent with my case before I presented my book and then get surprised with this argument like this after I did? Or is it that they already saw such potential but just were not honest or caring enough to convey that to others or present themselves accordingly?

-------   

(Added July 26, 2024)

 I ask here the same conditional acceptance questions I asked in the post of July 20 about the acceptance to my offer but this time apply them to the acceptance of the corruption guy to the acceptance of the judges to my offer. Absent having a related conditional attachment to his acceptance to their acceptance, his acceptance to their acceptance means that he accepted that the agreement with me supersedes the agreement with him.  

Having the possibility that the guy through the power of his agreement with those judges forces them to take all that time has been the only thing that stands for those judges here and it seems to have gone now.

----

You cannot appeal an issue to which you had not objected to the Court at the time. So here even if you assume the guy was in a similar following position with those judges, had he raised to them when they agreed to my offer the issue of which of the two agreements (the one with me and the one with him) supersedes the other on the right to time?  

------

Because the restriction on communicating with me had been for the corruption guy,  the argument that the judges should not have exceeded their authority under the agreement with the corruption guy when they dealt with my offer is not even comparable to the above.   

    

(Added July 25, 2024)

Again, I do not know how anyone can deny how in that environment it was very established and understood that it is part of the agreement that if my argument convinces enough of those judges then the delivery of the offer amount to me should occur fairly soon? But while this time thing was new, there has been something that remained the same like being engraved in a stone and deeply anchored at the root of the matter from after denying my petition in May 2015 to this day. That thing is the refusal to make direct acknowledgement to my existence while dealing with the matter. Throw in the quality of my book and enjoy how the latter explains the former.    

  

(Added July 24, 2024)

Ending The Demand Pause

My seven days prior notice period has not elapsed yet, but expect my demand to come back this Saturday unless it gets fulfilled earlier. The end of August is not that far, but this is the position that would make me feel better morally. 

Actually, since the demand pause I have put is about the effect of the demands, not communicating the demand messages, I do not need to wait until Saturday to make demands that would take effect starting from there. So, I am declaring here that starting from the first minute of this Saturday, the pause I have put on my demands will no longer exist. And again, no matter in exchange for how much more, I do not accept delaying for even one minute delivering the original obligation owed to me. This is an absolute refusal to sell.

(Added July 20, 2024)

The Right to Time Here - 4 

I cannot believe that anyone in the environment before I presented my book really thought that there would be a precut time for the judges and/or the guy open for them to use it any way they want before fulfilling their obligation toward an argument of mine after it convince enough number of those judges. Time cannot delay for no  reasonable justification the fulfilment of a contract that did not give a precut time. There is no such justification here. The case was denied and therefore the offer I made  should be assumed as starting from a point preceding the authority of the judges and that makes it the top controller here. Did anyone take the acceptance of the judges and the guy to the offer as  conditional requiring such right to time? Did they present themselves in a way that fits such conditional acceptance? Did  they show involvement in the offer for themselves beyond just judging the quality of the argument I would present and fulfilling their obligation accordingly? Could claiming such right to time be anymore baseless with an overwhelming amount of signs to the contrary witnessed by everyone?

By the way, even had this situation been already resolved, I still would have been arguing that I am the correct one here, unless I find otherwise. 

-----

With undenied cases the above would also apply provided that the judges had agreed on the offer as not part of the formal communication. This is not the way things are taken by default and that is why I was wrong in the post of July 17 below.     

       

                              (Added July 19, 2024)

 You can put makeup on a pig and make it win a beauty contest easier than you can hide how this situation sounds like a broken promise. Anyway, assuming the other side had more time from after enough number of the judges read my argument and became convinced than what I have been arguing for, how much time that is? Up to the end of June was not good enough to cover it? What am I in now? Is it my time and therefore if I demand what the other side owes me I should receive it? I already did and no such outcome occurred. Or is it that the other side think it is still its time. If so, when shall the time no longer belong to the other side according to its own view? Or is it that I should not know that either but instead just surrender myself to its power?

-------

My Prior Notice

I am here giving a seven days or more (the choice belongs to me) prior notice for my intention to undo the pause which I have put in July 12 on my demands.   

I am considering the question of how much I need to separate the prime actors from the secondary on the other side when reactivating my demands. 

                        

                           (Added July 17, 2024)

                                     The Right to Time Here -3

Even had the case been not denied but I made that offer with the guy and the Court accepting it, the offer would also be the top controlling thing and nothing else related to the case can delay satisfying the obligation of this offer. I cannot see how could that be missed here despite being that much the common way to understand such arrangement.

And even assuming I also said there, like here, that my argument would be like a new case when I present it, that only allows for the convenience to allocate the time to read the argument and think about it, not postponing acting on the conviction to trigger fulfilling the obligation of the offer. 

Nevertheless, denying my petition adds support to the first argument here and also, through the argument of July 15, to the second.

                             (Added July 16, 2024)

                                     The Right to Time Here -2

Actually, a better argument is simply this: It is clear that the offer I made the corruption guy came to fill the authority gap left after the case was denied by the Court. Therefore, if the offer got accepted by the other side, that means it became the top controlling thing and nothing else related to the case can delay satisfying the obligation of this offer.

----

So, again, except for the pause I have put on my demands on July 12, the other side has been in my time and failing to carry out its obligation according to the offer since very shortly after enough number of the judges read my argument and became convinced.                     

  

 (Added July 15, 2024)

The Right to Time Here

I do not know how anyone in the environment before I presented my argument could have missed seeing it as the final triggering thing for the end of the matter. Things were so much so that I myself in that position felt bad for the time I kept taking and stopped watching TV from April 2023 or earlier until I presented the argument in December 14. I think that even for a fraction of the time that passed before I presented my argument a person in a similar position to that of the other side here claiming still having the right to the time for other things related to the matter would be met with the question: And what do you think all that passed time was for?  And looking deeper into the context adds even more support here. It is not like I and the corruption guy have agreed from the  onset to take the matter to the judges away from the official path. Instead, this followed the judges denying my petition and all the complaining I did about injustice here. So if the issue here is that much the abuse of power, how much does it satisfies addressing it that dealing with it was such incomplete solution with regard to the powers it leaves to the judges that it allows taking even a fraction of the time that was taken here after the judges read my argument and became convinced?     

                                      (Added July 14, 2024)

Like I said earlier, I have been taking that challenge as if it is an abstinence challenge rather than just not being detected. Now I am adding that I would report here my own failure within 48 hours. By the way, how many days did the characters on the Seinfeld show last on the same challenge? Here I do not know how much even longer than a year I could have been into this abstinence and we are still counting (However things happened while in the sleeping dreams twice).

As a guy, I consider that clearly defined point (you know to what I am referring here) as the point if not reached then the abstinence is still on regardless of any other thing done.   

                          (Added July 12, 2024)

Because I do not yet want to burden others with reversing for my demands their path here (especially now with how seeing  those demands as a matter of right may be intensified because of the argument that from after a short while after enough number of the judges read my argument and became convinced they no longer had authority to take more time) I am here pausing the demands I made below. Also, to counter the thought that I need signals to maintain this pause, I am also declaring here that I would declare my intention to undo this pause at least one week before I do it.

Actually, because of the possibility of a deadlock resulting from the guy demanding the time according to this pause, I am here declaring my intention to undo this pause (What I intend to do is to limit the pause to only the fully determined period of time to which the Court and the guy have already agreed on before today (July 12, 2024)).  

                                    (Added July 11, 2024) 

I am again pointing out here that I do not accept anymore having the other side plays God on me for when I would receive the obligation it owes me, which I have won fair and square in front of every one, and I do not care how much it is (supposedly) willing to add to that obligation in exchange for prolonging my being in this situation.  

-----

My willingness to accept dealing with me without direct communication and acknowledgement was part the earlier challenge which I won with the argument I made, then I gave all that extra time on it, but now I do not tolerate any of such communication as the main way to deal with me.

-----

I took an exception from my general way of 24 hours time limit for change after posting and changed the title of this whole thread.

                                       (Added July 10, 2024) 

I again demand receiving the obligation the other side owes me and point out my refusal to have that delayed in exchange for receiving more.   

------

In what parallel universe the other side here is not considered  gone back on its word or promise?

-------

What moral person would risk taking the position of the other side? Nevertheless, let me show my position even more clearly by emphasizing and reiterating that if the other side delivers to me double its obligation now even though it could have delivered just its obligation an hour earlier, I still would not consider that the additional amount I received justifies the delay. 

-----

A moral person , to begin with,  would have not taken the risk of going where the other side has gone here, and assuming such person does then just one direct declaration of those I kept repeating  would have been enough to correct that path.   

                                       (Added July 9, 2024) 

I have just noticed that I erred in the starting post below when I  assumed that denying the petition keeps only the granted authority. However, I also noticed that I did not need to go that complicated approach. Instead I now focus directly on the issue itself and ask: How many in the environment before I presented my book took providing a convincing second amendment argument as sufficient on its own to trigger very close in time fulfillment for the offer amount obligation on the other side and how many thought of the convincing as being open to other constraints and restrictions before it can trigger such no delay fulfillment? 

-----

Denying the petition takes away their original authority and leaves us to determine what can and cannot be done through the context and the environment just like in any communication between two parties which leads to some duties on them, and the communication here seems to overwhelmingly support that from very shortly after enough number of those judges read and became convinced in my argument the other side has lost any right to delay without my permission delivery of its obligation to me.    

 

                                

                                     (Added July 8, 2024) 

I emphasize again that I do not accept giving away any amount of time in exchange for receiving more here.

----

                          (Added July 6 2024)

It has just occurred to me that I did not need to take into account in the argument I made yesterday my earlier acceptance. The effect of my earlier acceptance being contingent on receiving the original amount by June 30, the failure to deliver that cancels that effect. So, from very shortly after the judges read my argument and became convinced, the other side has been and continues to be in my time and failing to carry out its part of the deal.

I also want to bring to attention that although my argument very probably did, I think that convincing every judge there was not required to bring the immediate receiving of that original amount.       

                                           (Starting Post) 

While on its face such taking of time has already looked like a bad thing no moral person would risk doing, carefully considering the facts here seems to even put doing that further away from being a right. And except for how you take my acceptance for that while being in this position, I am also including here a big chunk if not most of the time between December 13 or 14 2023 and June 30 2024. Let us start with the fact that they have denied my petition.  Therefore they cannot take the matter here with more authority  than what was granted to them here. So arguing that those judges have been taking this time working on my compensation issue does not provide even a valid root for a justification here. The burden of proof for that here is on them. Facts are strong in  supporting only that this was already handled except for the  part of evaluating my second amendment argument which if found convincing would trigger receiving that compensation.  So after those judges have read that argument and became convinced, how can even a fraction of such delay be justified for them with regard to acting on this conviction according to the only way they were authorized to act?

-----

Actually, we do not need to look for the facts with regard to the authority I am arguing for, and that is because accepting it is shared by both sides.

-------

Even with assuming good intention toward me by those who have been keeping me in this position, it is scary in what it reflects on them. That is because with regard to my book, I was expecting others to think "hey this guy kept himself in that situation that long in order to do good work" much more than them to think "hey this guy kept himself in that situation that long because of how much he wants money" especially for those who rule on my argument.

-----   

Having done the thinking above, it can now be declared clearly and without hesitation that the other side has failed in carrying out its obligation here.

-------

Those on the other side are not just any individuals but judges and not any judges but the judges of the highest court and they are not just on the side with the failure to carry out that commitment but they themselves have been making this failure.

------  

 

1107: How do you people evaluate danger?

  How about THIS? Why would one need to fatally shoot a person just because of the danger of holding a knife? I would have wondered about such response to danger in any place and for any person let alone where you can buy guns and even carry them with you like here and for a person who has chosen to work as cop. So there is such easy possibility for you to approach a car to ask for the license and registration of the driver but instead get shot and this is your response to the danger of a knife even when the holder is not contact close? Only in the imagination of people here that knives are as dangerous as guns like this. They are not even close. Any thing that can be thrown to cause injury is comparable to a knife. In addition to all that, we also have here that those officers came because of this danger, and therefore one expects them to be prepared for the suitable response at least at the level of who would shoot and where to target.  

1106: The Deadline

                                           (Added July 4 , 2024) 

                                

I again demand to receive what the other side owes me and points out that time counts at the minute level here and that satisfying this demand can also be done on holydays. 

 ----------                                           

To begin with, could this situation been any crazier at its start? They on their own brought an additional compensation issue and then made it hold them down from processing the resolution of the original one. And now they are extending this craziness from earlier than two thirds of their term ago to beyond the end of the term, despite how uncommon this is.  

-------

Despite preferring not to do that, I need to temporarily interrupt the flow of my posting here in order to make this adjustment: 

With one difference, I am here reapplying the same plan related to refusing or accepting beyond the amount of the offer depending on if it requires from me a separate depositing action or not. The difference is that I would follow this plan only when activated and the Court has the choice to activate it but the corruption guy does not.  I would depend on what is conveyed to me and declare that here. I am declaring this as a promise, but I still keep the power to cancel or change it anytime I want, with the effect of such cancelation or change starting 24 hours from as soon as it becomes posted. 

-------- 

                                           (Time: 2:05 pm EST)   

The plan above is canceled, but as set there this cancellation will not take effect until the passing of twenty four hours from the time of posting this.

----------   

 Hey corruption guy, whether you do that trying to play the stick  and carrot with me or it is a signal for a real thing know that it has no effect on the morality reason here. In other words, I am not going to tell myself to accept an insulting situation if it would last for only a short time. In other words once again, I am not faking my consideration for the morality issue here.            

                       

                                 (Added July 3, 2024)  

It is now July 3. So why haven't the other side yet pay me anything it owes me according to the offer?

By the way, anyone conveys that at any moment I failed that abstinence challenge is not conveying the truth (Although the challenge is at the detection level, I took it as if it requires complete abstinence). 

-----------

For the time to June 30 I convinced myself that I am in continuation to the original way my situation has been dealt with and that other people with cases often also have no knowledge when shall their cases get decided within that time frame until it occurs. Now, I do not accept being left in the unknown nor without direct communication acknowledging my existence, even in exchange of receiving double the offer amount the next day.

---------

I demand the satisfaction of the obligation toward me to occur as soon as possible. Time counts at the minute level and this applies on holidays as well. 

-------

If there is a real thing here, I need it to materialize at the closest time that can be done, and I refuse to exchange this for trillions more later.

                                      (Added May 13, 2024)

In case the word "that" confused it, the June 30 date above refers to June 30, 2024 (Added July 3: According to the change of position that have happened after posting this, "below" replaces "above" here)

                                   (Starting Post)            

Unless there is a disagreement on that June 30 is the deadline to resolve my issue with the corruption guy, I have no interest in getting signals telling me when this resolving shall occur.

                                        

                                           

1105 This Special Soccer

(Added September 20, 2024)

After watching THIS match I want to again point out how much it appears to me that the blocking of potential shooters here is not as fast and as shielding as that in men's soccer. The difference in how much men are more willing to be shot in the face or in a sensitive area for this purpose seem far from explaining this difference in blocking quality. Actually, we all have seen how men players put their hands to protect an area of their bodies when they are part of a wall against a direct free kick. So how come they do not have such worry when blocking potential shooters during active playing? I think it is because they know that if they do the blocking fast enough and get close enough to the potential shooter then the risk is negligible. In fact, I cannot recall ever seen an incident of being shot in the face in men's soccer. I only saw that in women's and I think it is caused by the hesitation.   

(Added September 4, 2024)

Watching the first match of Monterrey Femenil in the summer cup yesterday, I met an issue with the playing of this team I have never seen anywhere before. There are so many examples for the common problem (I like to call it the middle eastern teams syndrome) of doing good work in conducting so many attacks but without good finish. Here it is the reverse. I have never seen a team that can be that much dangerous near the goal but that much not interested in getting close to the goal. 

There is also an issue with their defending. They seem to easily allow a free zone near their goal. 

By the way, although never been a professional player or even considered that good in it in general, I often feel like I could have made better of a woman soccer team than their coach is doing.       

(Added August 18, 2024)

I have mentioned more than once the issue of pause and pausing in the defense in the NWSL, and although things seem to be improving I still want to use THIS of a match occurred on June 29 as example through what happened at the shot at the goal resulting from the attack starting from 1:01:28 (57:00 game time). There are cases in which the last defender in front of the shooter takes more time than here just standing rather than moving forward toward the shooter to reduce the available shooting horizon for that shooter. And in general I have noticed what seems like a general confusion in applying one very basic rule of soccer and its exceptions. The rule is simply that the goal keeper is the only one who should stay in her place while all others in their defense effort should put their first priority moving to intercept the ball and getting close to the opposing player for better blocking. Many times you are also confusing your goal keeper by blocking her or her view when you instead get close to her to join her in protecting the goal.  

(Added August 17, 2024)

What is going on with soccer? I mean in general for both genders? When did it start allowing such ridiculous level of forceful interactions and holds like wrestling? I had not watched soccer for decades until the 2018 world cup followed by women's world cup of 2019 where I so this first and criticized it as not giving both genders the same level of serious consideration. But now it also seems like a high level of such interactions is the norm and occurring everywhere.    

(Added August 12, 2024)

I was very surprised by the effect of adding that Brazilian defender to the Houston Dash and how she was like a backbone that improved the whole team. Unfortunately,  I now need to ask if anyone who watched the following matches (I am currently at June 28) can honestly claim not noticing  discrimination in her treatment and unholy grouping and alliance against her by members of her own team?

(Added July 29, 2024)  

Are those putting this schedule for the NWSL competition really honestly working for the cause? If we make the players themselves vote how many of them would choose the season off period to be in the winter months rather than the summer months? Even then I would reduce the number of matches if it is too exhausting. People are interested in watching beautiful soccer, not in watching who can win in an unnecessary exhaustion or toleration to heat and humidity competition.

                                    (Added July 16, 2024)

Anyone else feels like a number of NWSL teams are so unable to score because of a psychological shield that if instead scoring counts when the ball misses the goal more balls would end up in the goal?

   

                                (Added July 2, 2024)

I again remind that the NWSL players and their coaches may need to pay special attention to how fast a path to the goal in front of an opposing player with the ball gets blocked, and that such blocking may require reducing not only the horizontal distance with that player but also the vertical one.  It would be really bad to do the things that require skills and fitness but get less recognition because of such alertness only issue.               

                                    (Added June 29, 2024)

I do not know how with seeing how much the commentating in men's soccer is focused on what is going on in the field could one feel okay about the commentating in the NWSL? In how many of men's matches shown recently on CBS or Fox networks did the players appear like here  in being left running on the field while the commentators divert the attention away from them?

----------

For the above and every other thing I say about the NWSL I want to remind that I speak from a watching position that is  as current as the one I most recently mentioned (So, here it is May 17).  

                                         (Added June 28, 2024) 

Look at this touch at 1:43:59 in the match HERE.  Also, in general, the brave souls who dared to watch the European football may owe it to themselves to have some antidotes from at least the highlights for the matches offered on the NWSL+ website (Although the above selection, for example, is not included in the highlights of that match)                                     

                               (Added June 27, 2024)

Beside having that "analysis" we hear in the NWSL matches not helping with enjoying the game, if one rewatch the match and really put the focus on that "analysis", how much of it would appear having good value as unknown beneficial knowledge? Actually, unless it is a joke, even with a fraction of such capability to tell that much what need to be done and in every match, who on earth would not even let go of the like of Pele in their teams in order to raise enough money to hire for the coach position any one of such soccer "analysts"? 

By the way, starting from the earliest, I am currently at May 17 and the match I watched yesterday  between North Carolina and Utah that is listed on NWSL+ as of May 17 is actually of March 17 according to a youtube video. I suspected it being from before May 17 because of something I heard at its end that did not fit my watching history, and then I did that youtube search.    

                                        (Added June 18, 2024)

Look at this goal at 9:07 (video time) in THIS women soccer match from China. Actually based on what I have watched from it so far the playing in general seems high quality and I intend to watch this whole match and probably other women soccer matches from China.                                 

                                 (Added June 15, 2024)

How exhausting is this NWSL Schudle? How much could this be why players sometimes fall on their own and the reason for the lower performance we saw, or shall be for what we shall see in the future? Should those teams have been divided into growps? Frankly speaking I for example usually pay attention to just how good or bad a team have played and the number of matches never occured to me as a factor. So, unless that number is noticeably low, how many other people are like this? So, by as much as the current situation suggests teams are not benefitting from such number of matches, wouldn't that alternative path have been be better for enabling teams to show better playing which can lead to better appreciation and all the benefits that can follow from that including better compensation leading to better motivation to play more?

                                    (Added June 13, 2024)

Often in the NWSL an attacker may get what feels like as much as 3 seconds of time or more in the penalty box to make her shot free from any close obstruction. This is also related to the issue of the defense being badly spread or distributed in that area. How could coaches be this okay with such problems in the defense? Have they sufficiently brought them to the attention of their players and kept pressing for the correction? Up to what I have watched so far (May 4), it seems like at least the first goal is most of the time the result of such under performing defense rather than a really outperforming offense.

On the plus side, in the recent days, I saw more frequently better efforts and remarkable savings by the goalkeepers, and Utah showed in most of the time in its match of May 3 a surprising leap in the quality and seriousness of its defense (The offence was also better).

                                     (Added June 11, 2024)

I think that for many people (myself included) an insufficient  vigilance on the defense side in soccer can prevent a match from being considered a serious no joke game even if it is good according to all other measures. The defensive reaction to cover the adjacent open area in the penalty box should be like a reflex. Any pause is not acceptable. Any clear path and clear view to the goal for an attacker possessing the ball should not last longer than a glimpse for a fraction of a second. 

By the way, while I hear it used for even when a shot does occur, I think "denied" is originally intended to express the blocking of the path to the goal when there is a potential shot, and I prefer to see it reserved for that.    

                                    (Added June 8, 2024)

The crazy Visible allowed me to exceed 100 gb of hotspot data  even though my plan ($45 monthly including the tax) which is the best one available from them does not say it give more than  50 GB of high priority data. Most of this data went for my one NWSL match a day, and I kept watching for slowing or interruptions signs in the connection so that I duplicate the plan with another phone and continue with the matches, but nothing of that happen.

On the other hand, about a month earlier, I tried to exceed the 25 gb hotspot I got from Cricket (which was the result of 15 gb that comes with the $60 monthly fee plus $20 for an additional 10 gb hotspot) and things stopped around that limit and my download was spoiled in a way that felt like the cartoon way of having a fist extends from the phone and tries to punch me for daring to do that.     

                                     (Added June 3, 2024)

When it comes to the issue of hand-ball contact I remember from decades ago hearing about distinguishing between a hand  seeking a ball and a ball seeking a hand.  In any case, I do not think moving the hands away to the back is a good solution to avoid a penalty kick. No body can play comfortably in such posture. Moreover, it is distracting for a person in the defending position to focus on what part of the body should be away from the path of the ball rather than what should block the ball. Focusing on intercepting the ball with the valid body parts is a better alternative in my view.        

                                     (Added May 28, 2024) 

I am currently at April 20 in watching the matches and it seems like the horrible commentating issue has dangerously spread to male commentator. Again, they need to know that commentators are not given such position because of interest in their conversation with each other like sitting in a cafe. This is insulting to the viewer and also, with more harmful effect, the players. Instead, their job is to connect the viewer to what is going on in the field. I have never experienced such thing in men's soccer, but it is like the rule here. Actually, even without the obligations of the commentating task, it makes you wonder how could someone who even modestly likes the game be that much unable to stay with it? They seem like unable to keep continuous interest for what is going in the field for even couple of minuets or less. 

                                  (Added May 19, 2024)

Here is a special selection of mine from what I have watched so far (from March 16 to March 30) for anyone short on time and wants something that is extra serious and extra exiting from the NWSL: It is the second half of the Portland Thorns vs Racing Louisville which occurred on March 30 and is available on the NWSL+ website. 

                                    (Added May 18, 2024)

                              Once Again...The Commentating

If those commentators rewatch the game on which they commentated, would they agree that they really did a commentating task? If they were watching a game they like at a cafe and a person talked loudly to another the same kind of talk they did, would that be engaging for them in the game or distracting them away from the game? Or let me put it this way: Would such a talk sound to them as just inconsiderate behaviour or both inconsiderate and abnormal? If such talk is real commentating, it should sound both. That is because real commentating is mostly not conversational. Despite what some may think, this kind of talking is contrary to and strongly conflicts with the talking issue that is commonly attributed to women, which the main complaint about it is that it focuses too much on the details rather than the bigger picture to solve the problem. Because of how it seems to outrageously ignore the psychological dimension, I am not with those taking this stand. Still, what is being complained about is itself what commentating needs.

And what would those assistant commentators really feel  when they rewatch the game and hear themselves that much doing all the talking rather than inserting something occasionally? And what on earth makes you provide advice or analysis with every move like this? When you listen to it again do you really think all that was needed? And how can you have that much specific knowledge of every player? Actually it is not specific in the sense that allows for judging if it is true or false; you just take a commonly wanted thing and attribute it to one player as special of hers then redo the same with the same attribute or hardly distinguishable one with other players. And why does that knowledge so often comes afterwards? For example, one player does a nice penetrating maneuver and you immediately start to talk to us about how that is some of her special capabilities. And how about when you redescribe to us something we just saw with you? Then what about those unsupported claims that may come with such description to tell us about what the players were thinking and the depth of their planning for what happened? Honestly, when you hear yourself doing that, how many air purifier would you think one would need to run in order to take care of such smoke blowing? 

....

                                        Like Never Before?

Although, I have hinted at it before, I still would not feel good enough unless I point out that to me it is highly supported to argue for that the soccer played in the NWSL is the most beautiful ever played in soccer offense. The harmony that probably drives people crazy about Brazil seems to be clearly surpassed here while the skills do not seem far behind there (the latter could be a big understatement). But there everybody gives it the appreciation it deserves while here I, for example, just saw in my NWSL match of today a girl receives a ball and do that back pass to it while the ball is in the air and the girl is running, and it went like nothing there to the commentator and/or his assistant. And speaking of doing things on go I just saw a well-known Brazilian player of the highly regarded Brazil team of 82 do that sudden switch on the run from pushing the ball in front of him to passing it back to someone behind and it still was not done as on the go without pause as that girl did it in the moment to which I referred  in May 2 (Racing Louisville vs Houston Dash game of March 16).

                                     (Added May 17, 2024)

Yesterday I mistakenly thought I finished all the matches of March 30. 

...

Up to this moment in my watching, the kind of goals I really count, which are those that come more as a result of the attack outperform the defense rather than the defense letting its guards down or not being fast in covering any occurring gaps seem to be considerably less here than they are in men's soccer.   

                                      (Added May 16, 2024)

Watching the matches one a day in sequence, I have just finished up to March 30 games and wonder why have the players regressed to losing themselves this much when opportunities in front of the  goal come and waste them like this?    

                           (Added May 15, 2024)

Where else can one see soccer attacks conducted at group level with harmony like that on the NWSL? Frankley speaking, despite the beauty it adds to the game, I have not taken such a thing into account until the latter brought it to me. And they do that in addition to the high individual skills they show.  

(Added May 14, 2024)

                        NWSL Channel                 

Beside the issue of adding real commentating, why is it that, in addition to the online availability, those who bought the right to the NWSL matches through 2027 do not make it available on a specialized free over the air channel showing reruns of season matches if their intention is to build more popularity so they get better return on their investment? Actually,  I also wonder the same for sports in general. Why is it that what is being done on all those free over the air rerun sitcom and drama channels cannot be done for sports?       

                                     

                                       (Added May 6, 2024)

                                  Downloading Vs. Streaming

It seems that many of the current matches are also available on Youtube and when downloading two of them yesterday in order to watch them later I noticed what seems to be a saving of what could be more than half the mobile data consumed in comparison with streaming them directly. Although I do the streaming from the NWSL+ website itself not Youtube, I do not think this what made the difference. Instead, I think it is that having the video runs from your computer allows for sending it compressed. 

...

The availability of the matches on youtube or their download option may not be or stay the same now that the corruption guy saw me using this technique. The next match I searched for I could not find and the one after that showed no download option.                                            

                            

                                        (Added May 5, 2024)

Game1 above is Louisville Racing vs Orlando Pride.  Game2 above is North Carolina Courage vs Houston Dash.   Both occurred on March 16 and listed last and second to last on that website.

...

Searching for a list of all NWSL matches without showing the results, so that I look on Youtube for any match that is not available on the NWSL+ website. Not only finding such list has not yet been successful but I got some matches spoiled for me by showing the results with the offender being the NWSL site itself (Although NWSL+  does not show the results with its replay list). How hard is it to include in such list a button giving the option of showing the results rather than start with that? 

                           (Added May 3, 2024)

This is the fourth NWSL game I have watched starting from the earliest available on that website and in all of them the sun seems to be too strong. I do not remember even anywhere close to this such sun in men's soccer. And this is despite that for the trunk area of the body men need to wear only the t-shirt. Even more important than the heat issue is the UV issue. 

By the way, I want here to clarify that unlike my earlier one, my reference to places like where I came from above is not about soccer being the most popular sport there. Instead it is about the similarity of lacking a democratic system or from how far in the past it has been established.

Also, although registration in the NWSL+ site is free, it was not my intention above to call the games "Game1" and "Game2" in order to force that rather than allowing for looking for the games on Youtube. Since I have already mentioned that I am watching those games starting from the earliest and then also mentioned that I am not being selective at the game level, I thought that there is no need to specify the games by name. 

Here is, again, the LINK to that website. You do not need to be registered to see what games they offer.

...

Actually, despite what I said about that last issue above, had I realized that the links lead to the registration without  showing which match is the target and connected that to the issue above, I would have mentioned the names of those matches.                                    

                                 (Added May 2, 2024)

One of the commentators for the soccer game that aired on CBS yesterday kept using the word "majestic" for a move done there. So I would like to present as my gift to him these two moments I selected from two NWSL games (which, again, I am watching in sequence and not being selective): 

Game1

Game2

But because I do not want to spoil the games for those who have not seen them yet, I put the points of time and the interesting thing I am pointing out listed as item 1 and 2 in this FILE .

                                (Added May 1, 2024) 

Those girls continue to amaze me and now I am at a stage that makes it hard for me to avoid wondering about and trying to find any reason against considering the NWSL soccer the best soccer one can find in the world at least for the present time (although with extremely  horrible female "commentating").

By the way, the guy writing this is the same guy who did not shy away from criticizing, on the ground that men play tennis better, giving the same winning prize amount to both genders.      

                                         (Added April 30, 2024)

 Watched the game that was just aired on CBS between those two big names men soccer teams with stadium filled to its max and you think it was good? For me I just tolerated it to its end (which luckily came before mine). Anyway, now go to this NWSL website and after registering go to the home page and from the "2024 Replays" list you can select randomly or do what I did yesterday with the intention of watching all of them and click the arrow all the way back to the first which occurred on March 16 for Racing Louisville vs Orlando Pride and honestly answer to yourself which of those two games entertains you better. I watched this yesterday and, as it is often the case with these games, feel like I treated myself to something really good.  

...

Okay, here we go again, I barely watched the first half of the second available game (between North Carolina and Houston) and felt like driven crazy. Again, and again and again those players are not getting their fair chance in something that has been provided for every soccer game from the time of Hammurabi: Normal Commentating. Re watch that first half or get a transcript and tell me could the woman commentator show anymore that she just want to escape from what is occurring in the field? And how long were each of her sentences? five pages?  And for women commentator-helpers: Even aside from the issue of distracting the viewer away from the field, how much of the analysis and advice you give is really just over complication of already known things? 

And, like I said before, I think you can pick a woman from the street in places like where I came from and find her commentating normally engaging. But the problem exist here because of that group identity thing. 

                                            (Starting Post)

I wonder how many who like me came from a place where soccer is the most popular sport agree with me that women's soccer has a special level of efficient and accurate passing of the ball and utilization of the whole field and that at least when this is combined with skills like those in the NWSL it shows soccer with a kind of beauty we have not experienced before? Of course this is not always the case. For example, the game of the Chicago Red Stars I watched on Ion yesterday was especially disappointing in that regard. It felt like the players of that team were shooting their passes and needlessly direct them ten meters in front of the receiver.