It is unbelievable that such a view to taking the constitution can be adopted by judges at the highest court in the nation. But again let me add it to my long list of astonishment by the effect of that identity establishment motivation to which I keep referring. Otherwise, the answer to this theory is very simple. The result of applying a word is not the same as the meaning of that word. It is an end meaning not a general (environment independent) meaning. The interpretation should begin from the general meanings of the word used not the end meaning of how that word was applicable at that time. That is because the path that was taken to reach the end application is part of what was said. Doing otherwise is not even close to fit being called following the text.
No comments:
Post a Comment