In Case Someone Wondering

Related to the recent event of murdering of Shia civilians with that explosion in Iraq, it, again, should not need a reminder that whether a person is a Shia, Sunny, Christian, Yazidi, or with any other faith or belief, that should not lower even a tiny bit seeing that the blood of that person is morally protected. But just in case someone draws the conclusion that for the Shia to be targeted like that they must have a belief that is at least very far fetched in relation to Islam, that person may get shocked with how depending on even just the Sunny books suggests the other way around. I was a teenager of an age that probably was closer to childhood when I first asked myself why do I believe in this sect rather than that. But later finding an answer based on the resources of the Sunny themselves was like a walk in the park. There is no comparison between choosing between Islam and a different religion (or no religion) and between those two sects. That is because in the latter case there is a shared root and that root is the prophet of Islam. Trying to really follow that root leaves no doubt in which side is the correct one and how much the claims of the other side is hard to even reconcile within just itself.

It is this clarity of facts what the Saudis are really trying to fight with their persecution of the Shia wherever they can reach them. 

943

291: The Outrageous Silence And Tolerance

This is completely unacceptable. Even if we assume we are legally helpless against corruption like that to which the preceding post refers, why is it being passed by with this low level of publicly pointing it out? The need to be restricted by a law should not be confused as implying that it is better not to criticize a thing as long as it does not violate the law. The power a society has through public shaming and preventing the unjust conduct or behaviour from mixing itself with the rest and appearing undistinguishable should be far from being ignored or underestimated like this, especially wherever and whenever the law cant reach or fails to reach. Beginning with those who are closest to the field where the wrong was done, making such criticisms with their unofficial capacities could be even more required from those who themselves are employed by the government. For example,  what prevents honest prosecutors from voicing out their true opinions about such an outrageous dealing with a case, to the maximum allowed by law? Do they think that the system as a whole is served better by extending the restriction of having an official role to include their views and opinions regardless of the level of corruption they see in other jurisdictional domains?

942

290: Boulder Colorado, Seriously?

I just want to know if the people there think that there is a competition for voting the lowest human beings as district attorneys? Otherwise why have they been keeping for twenty four years now those who conspire on the blood of that six years old whose skull was fractured with a baseball bat then finished off by strangulation like something that does not count?

941

 289

 To all those corrupt prosecutors and media who pretend otherwise to hide reality with regard to the killing of JonBenét Ramsey, there isn't even a shadow of reasonable doubt that that six years old was killed by those living with her inside that house, period. Things fit in this direction and against that joke intruder claim to the level that it feels even the walls are about to scream and say what was just pointed out here and if there were a reasonable doubt in this case then nobody would have been convicted in any other case.