888: Originalism and I

Can't wait to finish with the Second Amendment to attack my first ideological enemy in the field of interpreting the Constitution: ORIGINALISM!

But seriously isn't being an Originalist judge is like being a chemist in a lab who do not believe in the molecule theory?

If the language is disabled like this, how can a constitution be the highest official law of the land? What other way the makers of such document have to convey to us their instructions? If that does not matter to Originalists then how limited could be their view to the constitution being in that position?

I think that if it were not for the identity issue here it would have been unthinkable that a judge takes such a view. And similar to the issue with the Second Amendment, I also include in my criticism here what could be many if not most of those on the opposing side, for what seems to be incorrect or insufficient opposition to this view because I think that internally they are affected by the same psychological factor.  

887

From Blog Guns And Crimes

+279

Related to the preceding post, I plan to finish by May 31. I could have continued to the finish line when I was posting in February, on my own, or had I taken potential signals I received as being related to a deadline instead of just a positive side (this is also one of the to whom it may concern posts). 

886

From Blog Guns And Crimes

+278

Finishing with the Second Amendment is now the main thing I am trying to do. So nobody needs to worry for me with regard to that. 

885: More Like This

Hey, this artificial recession (which did not even come in exchange for good help to those known to be at real danger of this virus) was fun. Let's play another game. How about bombing our own stuff?