822

From Blog Corruption And The Government:

252: What Is Left To Trust?

Although it is less than a joke for its effect on me, I still want to ask how can people here trust being in this system after seeing all this fabrication and falsifying? I think that a feeling of group identity establishment by contrast through this conspiracy maybe making things more enjoyable. But how can one answer the doubts that it can be done in the future against other things?

And what about the media? What is left of the media after seeing that it can all join together like this in acceptance and support of lies and false news, serving one specific entity?

What has been happening here on both of those directions is literally beyond imagination.

821: Missed Something?

And the guy who said what was quoted in post 818 was not questioned about that combination or even the order given there but instead he was told that it is not just that. So, I wonder what else could be missed here to share being included with "the text" or even share the precedence of the other two elements above it? Maybe fairy stories (Although fairy tales may actually be already not that far from how history is being interpreted here) ? 

Like I said from the beginning, it is all about identity and culture establishment here. Could things get any clearer than with quotes like this screaming very loudly in that direction? Otherwise the distance between the farthest points in the galaxy seems closer than the sophistication in other fields here and how the constitution is taken. 

I realize that judges may compromise on the paths they choose because of the work load they have. But for anybody to put things in that order is a horrible thing to do. And for a judge to do that or even just tolerate it, it is a disaster.      

820: Fits Like Constitutionally Inspired Comedy

There was an Iraqi comedy series, probably from the sixties or seventies but still very popular, titled "Under The Razor of The Barber". There is a scene in one episode there, which I do not remember exactly but will try to use similar material in describing it here. In that scene a middle aged illiterate man enrolled in basic reading and arithmetic classes was trying to do his home work which involved finding the answer to six multiplied by six. So he sends his wife to the neighbors house to ask about the answer. A little later the wife comes back saying " Adnan is not home and Bahijah says 36" or "...35".

As shown by the quote in post 818, the constitution here seems to be often dealt with in no adequately better way than how the first character in that seen tried to deal with a mental material through social interaction as if it is open to what this person has said and what that person could have. But the character there was a simple illiterate man and interacting with people is probably all what he  knew, not a constitutional scholar.   

Stayman Apple

Are people here sure about their taste in apples? I thought I lost how I like apples until I tasted this brand and it reminded me of how apples taste where I came from. The difference between it and other brands is, generally to me, like the difference between two kinds of fruits. Unless there are reasons related to commerciality of the product, I do not understand why this brand is generally not in grocery stores, if they are all like the ones here in this regard. Even if the reason is that the popular taste on this here is different from mine, I still see a good probability that this taste was itself developed trying to accommodate being under this commerciality factor. Also related to the later, fruit here may need to ripen better before picked from trees, or doing whatever makes them better ripened at consumption time. 

Still, I, as usual, think that group identity establishment effort is a deeper motive beyond commerciality even if the latter was a reason.         

818

From Blog Guns and Crimes

+266: "tradition, history and the text"

Above is a quote about interpreting the constitution here from the argument of the New York gun case at the Supreme Court. The first question I have here is:

If someone were to have his representation of himself ignored, as a punishment, which one of these two paths would be the harshest: To be treated like a legally minor child, or to be treated like one of the makers of this constitution? 

817

From Blog Guns and Crimes

+265 (second amendment interpretation 200: New Argument For Capitalized References-4)

Here is the answer to what I wondered about in post +262, with a start from the root.

Because of the capitalization it has, the word "State" refers to all what proper nouns of state type target. The word "State" refers to the insides of those targets as separate worlds from ours because proper nouns refers to the insides of those targets as separate worlds from ours. The reason for the latter is that, unlike common nouns,  proper nouns do not use fittings in our world to refer to their targets. This absence of use of fitting in our world means referring to the inside of the target of a proper noun as a separate world because that absence has to be taken as one of the construction elements of a proper noun. If this absence is not taken as part of the proper noun then the same proper noun would not be referring to only one specific thing and that contradicts being a proper noun.  

816:

Unfortunately, I think that my argument in the preceding post against arbitration would not work because the company charges upfront and I did pay them within this scheme and the issues for which I want to sue happened within the prepaid period. Paying upfront means I bought the offered product and that includes the terms and conditions attached as part of it.   

815: Back to The Filling Efforts of Lawsuits

And I currently am putting effort on one for which I also need to go to state courts and I wonder how much corruption I will see there. 

But this is based on the assumption that the arbitration condition in the Terms stated by the company I am trying to sue does not apply on me. My argument for this is that I did not come to this company but it came to me by acquiring the company I was with. 

Maybe I need to put better effort to accept arbitration as a path to go through like the courts. 

  

814: That Lack of Self Engaging

Since I criticized those female soccer commentators here on the way they commentate (I am still shocked by the level of abnormality in that behaviour) and I have been experiencing occasional unease about that could be taken in support of the manner commonly attributed to men in listening to women's complaining about issues and immediately contribute a solution that was already obvious as a choice. I have no respect to looking away like this from the difference in engaging the self. Try to talk about something that he cares about like, for example, how his favorite sport team may not be able to get a player it very much wanted and see how his decisiveness in accepting the directly available solution may come only after passing through the feeling or emotion attached to the issue as a real existence. Being a man and being decisive are not synonymous with being a robot.

By the way, that female commentator with the British guy, seems to put much of the smoke blowing at the level generally seen with male behaviour to shame. Not only I saw her talk about the players as if she had a personal relationship with each of them but also saw her add stories and additional details no body can see but her in the events of the game.