822

From Blog Corruption And The Government:

252: What Is Left To Trust?

Although it is less than a joke for its effect on me, I still want to ask how can people here trust being in this system after seeing all this fabrication and falsifying? I think that a feeling of group identity establishment by contrast through this conspiracy maybe making things more enjoyable. But how can one answer the doubts that it can be done in the future against other things?

And what about the media? What is left of the media after seeing that it can all join together like this in acceptance and support of lies and false news, serving one specific entity?

What has been happening here on both of those directions is literally beyond imagination.

821: Missed Something?

And the guy who said what was quoted in post 818 was not questioned about that combination or even the order given there but instead he was told that it is not just that. So, I wonder what else could be missed here to share being included with "the text" or even share the precedence of the other two elements above it? Maybe fairy stories (Although fairy tales may actually be already not that far from how history is being interpreted here) ? 

Like I said from the beginning, it is all about identity and culture establishment here. Could things get any clearer than with quotes like this screaming very loudly in that direction? Otherwise the distance between the farthest points in the galaxy seems closer than the sophistication in other fields here and how the constitution is taken. 

I realize that judges may compromise on the paths they choose because of the work load they have. But for anybody to put things in that order is a horrible thing to do. And for a judge to do that or even just tolerate it, it is a disaster.      

820: Fits Like Constitutionally Inspired Comedy

There was an Iraqi comedy series, probably from the sixties or seventies but still very popular, titled "Under The Razor of The Barber". There is a scene in one episode there, which I do not remember exactly but will try to use similar material in describing it here. In that scene a middle aged illiterate man enrolled in basic reading and arithmetic classes was trying to do his home work which involved finding the answer to six multiplied by six. So he sends his wife to the neighbors house to ask about the answer. A little later the wife comes back saying " Adnan is not home and Bahijah says 36" or "...35".

As shown by the quote in post 818, the constitution here seems to be often dealt with in no adequately better way than how the first character in that seen tried to deal with a mental material through social interaction as if it is open to what this person has said and what that person could have. But the character there was a simple illiterate man and interacting with people is probably all what he  knew, not a constitutional scholar.   

Stayman Apple

Are people here sure about their taste in apples? I thought I lost how I like apples until I tasted this brand and it reminded me of how apples taste where I came from. The difference between it and other brands is, generally to me, like the difference between two kinds of fruits. Unless there are reasons related to commerciality of the product, I do not understand why this brand is generally not in grocery stores, if they are all like the ones here in this regard. Even if the reason is that the popular taste on this here is different from mine, I still see a good probability that this taste was itself developed trying to accommodate being under this commerciality factor. Also related to the later, fruit here may need to ripen better before picked from trees, or doing whatever makes them better ripened at consumption time. 

Still, I, as usual, think that group identity establishment effort is a deeper motive beyond commerciality even if the latter was a reason.         

818

From Blog Guns and Crimes

+266: "tradition, history and the text"

Above is a quote about interpreting the constitution here from the argument of the New York gun case at the Supreme Court. The first question I have here is:

If someone were to have his representation of himself ignored, as a punishment, which one of these two paths would be the harshest: To be treated like a legally minor child, or to be treated like one of the makers of this constitution? 

817

From Blog Guns and Crimes

+265 (second amendment interpretation 200: New Argument For Capitalized References-4)

Here is the answer to what I wondered about in post +262, with a start from the root.

Because of the capitalization it has, the word "State" refers to all what proper nouns of state type target. The word "State" refers to the insides of those targets as separate worlds from ours because proper nouns refers to the insides of those targets as separate worlds from ours. The reason for the latter is that, unlike common nouns,  proper nouns do not use fittings in our world to refer to their targets. This absence of use of fitting in our world means referring to the inside of the target of a proper noun as a separate world because that absence has to be taken as one of the construction elements of a proper noun. If this absence is not taken as part of the proper noun then the same proper noun would not be referring to only one specific thing and that contradicts being a proper noun.  

816:

Unfortunately, I think that my argument in the preceding post against arbitration would not work because the company charges upfront and I did pay them within this scheme and the issues for which I want to sue happened within the prepaid period. Paying upfront means I bought the offered product and that includes the terms and conditions attached as part of it.   

815: Back to The Filling Efforts of Lawsuits

And I currently am putting effort on one for which I also need to go to state courts and I wonder how much corruption I will see there. 

But this is based on the assumption that the arbitration condition in the Terms stated by the company I am trying to sue does not apply on me. My argument for this is that I did not come to this company but it came to me by acquiring the company I was with. 

Maybe I need to put better effort to accept arbitration as a path to go through like the courts. 

  

814: That Lack of Self Engaging

Since I criticized those female soccer commentators here on the way they commentate (I am still shocked by the level of abnormality in that behaviour) and I have been experiencing occasional unease about that could be taken in support of the manner commonly attributed to men in listening to women's complaining about issues and immediately contribute a solution that was already obvious as a choice. I have no respect to looking away like this from the difference in engaging the self. Try to talk about something that he cares about like, for example, how his favorite sport team may not be able to get a player it very much wanted and see how his decisiveness in accepting the directly available solution may come only after passing through the feeling or emotion attached to the issue as a real existence. Being a man and being decisive are not synonymous with being a robot.

By the way, that female commentator with the British guy, seems to put much of the smoke blowing at the level generally seen with male behaviour to shame. Not only I saw her talk about the players as if she had a personal relationship with each of them but also saw her add stories and additional details no body can see but her in the events of the game.    

813

From Bog Guns and Crimes

+264 Arguing After This New York Case

I do not intend to restrict myself from continuing to argue the meaning of the Second Amendment after the oral argument for the New York case even if that meaning was taken as one of the issues. Actually, I could really think that a case will be about deciding that meaning but still continue to argue even close to rendering a decision by the court. The intention for using the time for the separation emphasis I mentioned before is about me putting good effort to do things that way but it is not about compromising my argument if I fail to complete my work earlier. 

812

From Blog Guns and Crimes

+263: Weekly News Search

I have been wanting to say this for a long time but keep postponing it. This is related  to my auto google news search which I kept watching for probably years now. I made that search looking for normal search results. I, of course, still welcome artificial ones if the other side want them but I was not looking for them.

Yes, I once took the absence of results as indication for disapproval for something I said or did, but that came, again, because I thought the other side is the one who want that artificial creation of news. If this was not intended or no longer intended then the situation is very far from needing the other side to  modify its actions to fit my perception to reality here if that perception is wrong.        

And, by the way, I no longer as I was in the past looking for a case to be taken to argue things to the end. Although, seeing how this New York case look like a manufactured one, made me mistakenly think that the reason is the lack of filling for Second Amendment related cases.  

Related to that case, I do not care about how the upcoming argument look really about determining what should be done about the specific issue there. Instead I intend to check that argument carefully for Second Amendment inputs in general.   

811: This Is In Tolerable - 2

 At the beginning of this day of mine, I spent close to an hour trying to do something requiring only couple of clicks over the Internet because the connection kept going on and off. This is an hour of feeling my rights violated and helpless frustration at the hands of this guy and his corporate thugs until the corruption guy allowed me to use my Internet access. This is not an exceptional incident but general behaviour from Charter Communications. 

Things shouldn't be let loose like this. One should not need to fight the feeling of being humiliated for something that belongs to him like this. This is a joke and fake system. At least when it is not within their rights, thugs should not feel this safe from being prosecuted when they do crap like this. I have a contract with Charter. Behaving this way by an entity that offers to be engaged with the same kind of contract with anybody should be seen as fraud, if not against the person toward whom the bad action here was directed, at least against the nation as a whole. 

And if that is not enough, Charter also had done other things like, for example, taking my required input to access a website and replace it with different input to disable me from accessing that website, which I complained much about years ago (and I still consider it the worst thing Charter has done to me because it hides itself between you and the web page you want to access instead of directly seeing Charter causing the problem)

Here is a recent incident of Charter's readiness for malicious actions:

Trying to choose between two things, I spent sometime reading their reviews on Amazon. Those reviews made me inclined more to buy one and not the other but I did not complete the action until the next day and kept the web page on that thing in one of my windows . What happened on the next day was that the reviews link on that web page was replaced  with the reviews link for the thing that was less desirable to me. Even refreshing the page did not correct the problem until I started over and repeated the Amazon search that listed those two things. 

   

810: This Is Intolerable

This is intolerable. If seeing everything I do over the internet,  and have the choice to use that knowledge to mess anything I do there, and by a guy with connections and can pull things the way he wants like this guy, is not enough, even the access to the internet itself maybe taken away when he sees that I am trying to do something there. He and Charter are cooperating like criminal organization.

  

809

From Blog Guns and Crimes

+262

I probably felt it like a natural thing and did not pay sufficient attention when I made the preceding post to why should that reference be to another world instead of unknown world. However, whether I am wrong or right there, I do not intend to leave that argument as it is now.

808

From Blog Guns and Crimes:

+261 (second amendment interpretation 199: New Argument For Capitalized References-3)

Now I am more inclined to see that, unlike what I said in the preceding post, the earlier one had good enough depth but I needed to follow on that saying this which I now want to be my main argument:

Since a proper noun reference does not use a fitting in our shared world to refer to its target, it refers to the inside of that target as another world. Therefore, the inside of a proper noun reference target is out of our application domain. 

807: Google's Shopping Link

After depending on Google's Shopping for so long, I just knew that it may not or always do not bring you results Google can find on the internet for what you are looking to buy, if they are not sponsored. The notion of mixing what supposed to be providing information purely on the value of that information like what Google itself is supposedly doing, with something pushing that to secondary role like its Shopping link on the same page was far from me. I took the Shopping link as a focus of the search service provided by Google, on a specific category, not different kind of service. Should one also expect that, for example, Google's maps also may not show paths based on their quality first? With such situations something indicating a different kind of service is probably needed with the link on the main page and not just with the results when Google says that the shopping results were sponsored on the results page. Although to be fair, I doubt that this has not been a common behaviour among search engines in general.

806: Charter's Thuggery Actions

Based on reactions from other Americans in other matters, I wonder about them calling the police on Charter if it were to take away their internet access any time it wants without reason like it does to mine. Such reaction is not that far from being reasonable, given the thuggery nature of Charter's action in contract violation like that of, for example, if a seller does not give you something you just paid its price to him.

805

From Blog Guns and Crimes:

+260 (second amendment interpretation 198: New Argument For Capitalized References-2)

I probably did not go enough depth in the preceding post.
So let me add this update:

When there is a direct reference to a thing, as in a proper noun, the reference goes to the identity of that thing. Therefore we become under the restriction of how the structure of that thing was intended to be. That include the possibility that its elements were intended not to exist individually but only as parts of the whole. This restriction obligates us to take the thing only as a whole. On the other hand, with a common noun reference and even when there is only one thing that can fit, the reference do not target the identity of that thing and therefore we are not obligated to how it was structured beyond just fitting it in that container environment. 

804

From Blog Guns and Crimes:

+259 (second amendment interpretation 197: New Argument For Capitalized References)

Although the internal affectability of things is more common, it is not standing on its own without an enabling thing. It is more common because of the use of common nouns. Common nouns do not refer directly to things.  Instead they refer to fitting containers. Having those environments is what enables the internal affectability of things by constructing them according to those fitting environments. On the other hand, with proper nouns, the references go directly to the targeted things not to fitting environments containing them. Therefore we cannot affect those targeted things internally. 
In other words, we need access to the internal environment of things in order to be able to do internal effect on them. Common nouns give us that access but proper nouns do not.

Now, lets return to the capitalization rules of the language. We know that proper nouns should be capitalized. We also know that common nouns (like the word "state") should also be capitalized when attached to common nouns. Therefore, like how we take the word "state" as a general reference to any state, the word "State" is a general reference to what proper noun references of states target. Therefore, here, the words "free" and "security" are not internally applicable.

803

This is to the corruption guy:

So it is not enough for you to have companies act like thugs in your support that you additionally seek the help of cockroaches? Do you really think that the cockroach you are using can act in a way that I cannot detect if he is doing those things on his own or for you? I have already known this but I just decided to give you another sample of how I can detect your things without revealing that. I did the same when I only told you that I know you can detect what TV channels (and also radio stations) I watch over the air, even though my suspicion started years earlier (Although with this cockroach, this change of behaviour has been here for like months not years). 

802

I cant see a reason why in the preceding post I made seeing a history older than what it is, a consequence to seeing those people more on the primitive side, while things seems to fit better with the former causing the latter.  

801: Anything Escapes That Identity Establishment Thing?

I have been wondering about the general tendency to contain the thinking of the makers of it instead of really following them when interpreting the constitution. Couple of days ago I noticed how that can fit with the group identify establishment attempt I talked about many times before. A big part of those interpretations, if not most, use the environment  of that time for the purpose of that containment. That could be an attempt to view those people more like primitive people and through that see a history older than what it is.

800: New Posting Plan

Starting from now, generally, posts I make will be posted in their complete text here. A link to the more designated blog in relation to the issue could also be added but I do not want classifying posts to impede me like now while space for text storage for computers is more affordable than dirt. I could even repeat posting the same text on multiple blogs.   

799

Link (Various Topic Blog, High Courts Construing Directives)

798

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +257 (second amendment interpretation 196: Divergence From Normality?))

797

Link (Corruption And The Government, 251: Charter's Intentional No Internet Access For Me)

796

Link (Corruption and the Government, 247: And Now my wired internet access)

795

Link (Corruption and the Government, 245: Similar Story to This Death Allegation)

794

Link (Corruption and the Government, 243: "Autopsy Completed on  Epstein")

793

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +255: Post 253 needs more )

792

Link (Corruption and the Government, 241: Faking The Death of Epstein?)

791:

Link (Corruption and the Government, 241: Alleged Death of Epstein)

790

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" + 254 (second amendment interpretation 195: Burden of Proof for Generality of The Word "State" )

789

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" + 253 (second amendment interpretation 194: Explaining Why Capitalization (As Indicative of Recognition) Should  Be Taken That Way) )

788

LINK (All Topics Posts, Men's Club Soccer on TV)

LINK (Corruption and the government NO ON INTERNET ACCESSS)

786

Link (Corruption and the Government,  Those Thuggish Corporations)

785

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +252 Case Or No Case)

784

LINK (All Topics Posts, Physical Interaction In Women's Soccer- 2)

783

Link (Corruption and the Government,  And Again)

782

Link (Corruption and the Government,  Hulu Deleted my DVR Recordings Without Permission)

781

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +251 (second amendment interpretation 193: A Little Thing on The Go))

780

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +250 (second amendment interpretation 192: Preview of Potential Additional Argument for The Word "free"))

779

LINK (All Topics Posts, 104: This World Cup's 32 for 24 )

778

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +249 (second amendment interpretation 191: Better Argument for The Word "free"-2)

777

Link (Corruption and the Government, Corruption of Hulu Again)

776

Link (Corruption and the Government, The Level of corruption of Hulu)

775

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +248 (second amendment interpretation 190: Better Argument for The Word "free")

774

LINK (All Topics Posts, That Soccer Commentator )

773

LINK (All Topics Posts, What Is Wrong With Those Soccer "Analysts")

772

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" (+246: Recognizing When Elaboration is Needed, +247: Comment Section for Better Access Equality)

771

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +245 (second amendment interpretation 189: The Additional Part Below Is Wrong)

770

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +244 (second amendment interpretation 188: The Argument for The Word "free" )

769

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +243 (second amendment interpretation 187: Question for the believers in the state right theory  )

768

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +242 (second amendment interpretation 186: General environment Testing vs. Deeper Purposes)

767

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +241 (second amendment interpretation 185: Precedence of "security" and "free" )

766

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +240 (second amendment interpretation 184: On Development History ) )

765

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +239 (second amendment interpretation 183: Alternative Argument for "free" and "security" ) )

764

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +238 (second amendment interpretation 182: About "security" in Post 236) )

763

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +237)

762

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +236 (second amendment interpretation 181: That Missed Direct Path) )

761

LINK (various topic blog, +58: "Israeli" Vs. "Jewish")

760

LINK (all topics posts, "Certifiable Nerd?")

759

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +235 (second amendment interpretation 180: Was this taken seriously to begin with?) )

758

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +234(second amendment interpretation 179: Pointing Out The Level of Abnormal Behaviour Here) )

757

LINK ("GunsandCrimes" FKA "druggedonguns" +233(second amendment interpretation 178:  ",shall" in the Fourth Amendment)